ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024
Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical evaluation of a laxity-minimizing suture for rotator cuff repair.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Low Incidence of Adverse Events of a Novel Self-Tensioning No. 2 Round Suture in Rotator Cuff Repair: An IDEAL Stage 2a Registry Cohort Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecently, a new dynamic high-strength suture (DC) was introduced, also available in tape form (DT), featuring a salt-infused silicone core attracting water in a fluid environment to preserve tissue approximation. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the influence of securing throw number on knot security of two double-stranded knot configurations (Cow-hitch and Nice-knot) tied with either dynamic (DC and DT) or conventional (FW and ST) high-strength sutures and tapes, and (2) compare the ultimate force and knot slippage of the novel dynamic versus conventional sutures and tapes when used with their minimal number of needed securing throws.
methodsSeven specimens of each FW, ST, DC and DT were considered for tying with Cow-hitch or Nice-knots. The base of these Cow-hitch and Nice-knots was secured with surgeons` knots using 1-3 alternating throws. Tensile tests were conducted under physiologic conditions to evaluate knot slippage, ultimate force at rupture, and minimum number of throws ensuring 100% knot security.
resultsFor both Cow-hitch and Nice-knots, 100% security was achieved with 2 securing throws for DC, DT, ST, and with 3 securing throws for FW. With these minimum numbers of securing throws, ultimate force was significantly higher for Nice-knots versus Cow-hitch tied with DT (p = 0.001) and slippage was significantly less with Nice-knots versus Cow-hitch tied with DC (p = 0.019).
conclusionsThe minimum number of securing throws required to achieve 100% security was 2 with DC, DT and ST for both Cow-hitch and Nice-knots configurations, in contrast to FW where 3 securing throws were needed. With these minimum numbers of securing throws, Nice-knots were associated with significantly higher ultimate forces when using DT and lower slippage with DC versus Cow-hitch knots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38907860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.