ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2024
The relationship between asymmetrical grip strength criteria and fall incidence among middle-aged and older Chinese adults.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical importance of simple muscular fitness tests to predict long-term health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 94 cohort studies.British journal of sports medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for falls among older adults in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCurrent handgrip strength (HGS) protocols employ a variety of criteria, affecting the assessment of asymmetric HGS. The impact of these different criteria on fall prediction is understudied. This study was devised to compare the relative performance of average and maximum HGS asymmetry criteria as tools to predict fall incidence among middle-aged or older adults in China.
methods9627 Chinese adults 50 + years of age who were participants in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2013-2015 waves) were evaluated. The measurement of HGS was achieved based on either the maximum recorded value (HGSmax) or the average (HGSave), and these values were employed for the calculation of HGS asymmetry. Fall incidence over a 2-year period was evaluated based on self-reported data. Logistic regression analyses were utilized to determine the predictive performance of HGSmax asymmetry or HGSave asymmetry when gaging 2-year fall risk.
resultsSignificant differences in overall rates of HGS asymmetry and the rates of subdivisions thereof were observed when comparing the HGSmax and HGSave criteria, with moderate consistency (kappa = 0.599, p < 0.001). Over the 2-year follow-up period, 1743 fall incidents were recorded. Adjusted logistic regression models indicated that only HGSmax asymmetry > 30.0% was significantly related to fall risk (p = 0.034, odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.81).
conclusionThese findings highlight the importance of HGS criteria in detecting HGS asymmetry, and suggest that HGSmax is a more robust criterion for predicting fall risk among Chinese adults 50 + years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38907785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.