Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38907761›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Comparison of endoscopic versus focused parathyroidectomy in surgical management of single-gland primary hyperparathyroidism: a randomized clinical trial.

Seyed Mostafa Meshkati Yazd, Reza Shahriarirad, Sara Nayebi, Paniz Dehghan, Amirbahador Abbasi, Farhood Maghsoodloo, Kaveh Hamedani, Shirzad Nasiri

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seyed Mostafa Meshkati YazdDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza ShahriariradSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sara NayebiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Paniz DehghanDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Amirbahador AbbasiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Farhood MaghsoodlooDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kaveh HamedaniDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shirzad NasiriDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. dr.sh.nasiri@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver recent years, various advanced minimally invasive techniques have been developed for parathyroidectomy, and there was a universal acceptance of these less invasive procedures by surgeons. This study is designed to compare overall outcomes between endoscopic versus focused, single gland parathyroidectomy using intraoperative rapid parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) changes under general anesthesia in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) patients.

methodIn this randomized clinical trial, 96 patients diagnosed with PHPT were randomly assigned into two groups endoscopic and focused parathyroidectomy. Baseline clinical and demographical data were collected along with perioperative features. The success rate was evaluated based on ioPTH changes.

resultsThe ioPTH levels after five minutes in the endoscopic group were significantly lower than the focused group (P = 0.005). The success rate for endoscopic and the focused method was 95.3% and 77.1% during the first five minutes (P = 0.013) and 100% in both groups after ten minutes. A decrease in parathyroid hormone levels was significant in each group but not between each other. Postoperative calcium levels were significantly lower in the focused method (P = 0.042). The focused group also had a significantly shorter operation time than the endoscopic group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcome was significantly higher in the endoscopic group compared to the focused group.

conclusionThe endoscopic technique was superior to the unilateral focused neck exploration parathyroidectomy in the management of single-gland PHPT. Influencing aspects included higher postoperative calcium levels, more rapid success achievement, and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in the endoscopic group. However, patient selection and accurate adenoma localization are vital in this method.

Indexed as

EndoscopyHyperparathyroidism, PrimaryParathyroidectomyParathyroid HormoneAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeTreatment OutcomeParathyroid HormoneAdenomaEndoscopicMinimal invasive surgeryParathyroidectomySurgeryThyroidectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.