ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2024
Analysis of the correlation between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and the severity of coronary vasculopathy.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of Index of Cardiac Electrophysiological Balance (ICEB) for ischemia-reperfusion injury following coronary artery angioplasty.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Predictive value of systemic inflammatory response index for coronary artery disease and angiographic severity: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation of neutrophil/lymphocyte, monocyte/lymphocyte, and CRP/ALB ratios with the extent of coronary artery lesions and their predictive value.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Association Between Systemic Inflammation Response Index, Worsening of Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Association of systemic inflammation response index and triglyceride-glucose index with the severity of coronary artery stenosis in elderly patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Combined SHR and SIRI biomarkers predict increased coronary heart disease risk in type 2 diabetes.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Association and impact of inflammatory markers and cardiac structure on atrial fibrillation risk: a study integrating NHANES with real-world data.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The role of systemic inflammatory response index in predicting myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Association of systemic inflammatory response index and stroke: a cross-sectional study of NHANES, 2005-2018.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the correlation between Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). It also aims to assess the predictive value of SIRI for the severity of coronary artery stenosis. A total of 2990 patients who underwent coronary angiography were included in this study. The Gensini score was used to estimate the severity of coronary vascular lesions. The predictive ability of SIRI for CHD was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of CHD based on the SIRI index. The results showed that people with higher SIRI were more likely to have CHD (P < 0.001). After controlling for other risk factors, the highest quartile had a significantly higher incidence of coronary artery disease compared to the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-3.92, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the Gensini score was significantly higher in the fourth quartile group (T4) compared to the first (T1) and second (T2) quartile groups (P < 0.001). Additionally, the SIRI was significantly higher in the group with severe coronary artery lesions compared to the mild and moderate groups (P < 0.001). The SIRI also showed a higher predictive ability for the extent of coronary lesions under the ROC curve compared to other commonly used markers, including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < 0.001). Therefore, SIRI positively correlates with coronary artery stenosis in CHD patients, serving as an effective early screening marker for assessing stenosis severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.