ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2024
Detecting and Predicting Cognitive Decline in Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Telephone-Based Study.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ante-Mortem Clinical Characterization with Post-Mortem Family Interview and Medical Record Abstraction in a Traumatic Brain Injury Brain Donor Program.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Article
- Distinct Five-Year Latent Class Trajectories and Predictors of Functional Cognitive Independence Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A TBI Model Systems Study.Neurotrauma reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) can lead to long-lasting cognitive impairments, and some survivors experience cognitive decline post-recovery. Early detection of decline is important for care planning, and understanding risk factors for decline can elucidate targets for prevention. While neuropsychological testing is the gold standard approach to characterizing cognitive function, there is a need for brief, scalable tools that are capable of detecting clinically significant changes in post-TBI cognition. This study examines whether a clinically significant change can be detected using the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) in a sample of individuals with chronic TBI and investigates whether potentially modifiable factors are associated with cognitive decline. Ninety participants aged 40 or older with complicated mild-to-severe TBI participated in two telephone-based study visits ∼1 year apart. Demographic, head trauma exposure, comorbid medical conditions, physical, and psychosocial functioning data were collected via self-report. The BTACT, a brief measure of global cognitive function, was used to assess cognitive performance across six domains. A reliable change index for quantifying clinically significant changes in BTACT performance was calculated. Results revealed cognitive decline in 10-27% of participants across various cognitive domains. More specifically, only depressive symptoms, including depressed affect and anhedonia, were significantly associated with cognitive decline after correcting for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate (FDR). Other factors such as the number of blows to the head, male gender, dyspnea, increased anxiety symptoms, seizures, illicit drug use, and fewer cardiovascular comorbidities should be considered hypothesis generating. Importantly, age was not a significant predictor of cognitive decline, which challenges the assumption that cognitive decline is solely related to the natural aging process. It suggests that there are unique factors associated with TBI that impact cognitive function, and these factors can affect individuals across the lifespan. The BTACT is a brief and sensitive tool for identifying clinically meaningful changes in cognitive function over a relatively brief period (i.e., 1 year) in a sample of individuals in the chronic stages of TBI (i.e.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.