Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38907372›Full record

ReviewJMIR biomedical engineering2021

Monitoring of Sitting Postures With Sensor Networks in Controlled and Free-living Environments: Systematic Review.

Arpita Mallikarjuna Kappattanavar, Nico Steckhan, Jan Philipp Sachs, Harry Freitas da Cruz, Erwin Böttinger, Bert Arnrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arpita Mallikarjuna Kappattanavar *Hasso-Plattner-Institut, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-0704
Nico SteckhanHasso-Plattner-Institut, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-2046
Jan Philipp SachsHasso-Plattner-Institut, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8851-9285
Harry Freitas da CruzHasso-Plattner-Institut, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-5841
Erwin BöttingerHasso-Plattner-Institut, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-6676
Bert ArnrichHasso-Plattner-Institut, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-7667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA majority of employees in the industrial world spend most of their working time in a seated position. Monitoring sitting postures can provide insights into the underlying causes of occupational discomforts such as low back pain.

objectiveThis study focuses on the technologies and algorithms used to classify sitting postures on a chair with respect to spine and limb movements, using sensors and wearables such as inertial measurement units, pressure or piezoresistive sensors, accelerometers or gyroscopes, combined with machine learning approaches.

methodsA total of three electronic literature databases were surveyed to identify studies classifying sitting postures in adults. Quality appraisal was performed to extract critical details and assess biases in the shortlisted papers.

resultsA total of 14 papers were shortlisted from 952 papers obtained after a systematic search. The majority of the studies used pressure sensors to measure sitting postures, whereas neural networks were the most frequently used approaches for classification tasks in this context. Only 2 studies were performed in a free-living environment. Most studies presented ethical and methodological shortcomings. Moreover, the findings indicate that the strategic placement of sensors can lead to better performance and lower costs.

conclusionsThe included studies differed in various aspects of design and analysis. The majority of studies were rated as medium quality according to our assessment. Our study suggests that future work for posture classification can benefit from using inertial measurement unit sensors, since they make it possible to differentiate among spine movements and similar postures, considering transitional movements between postures, and using three-dimensional cameras to annotate the data for ground truth. Finally, comparing such studies is challenging, as there are no standard definitions of sitting postures that could be used for classification. In addition, this study identifies five basic sitting postures along with different combinations of limb and spine movements to help guide future research efforts.

Indexed as

algorithmsback painclassificationextremitiesmachine learningmovementsitting positionspinetechnology

Identifiers

PMID38907372
PMCPMC11041431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.