Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38907325›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024

Two-stage conversion of syngas and pyrolysis aqueous condensate into L-malate.

Alberto Robazza, Flávio C F Baleeiro, Sabine Kleinsteuber, Anke Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alberto RobazzaInstitute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences 2: Electro Biotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - KIT, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Flávio C F BaleeiroDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Sabine KleinsteuberDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Anke NeumannInstitute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences 2: Electro Biotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - KIT, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany. anke.neumann@kit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid thermochemical-biological processes have the potential to enhance the carbon and energy recovery from organic waste. This work aimed to assess the carbon and energy recovery potential of multifunctional processes to simultaneously sequestrate syngas and detoxify pyrolysis aqueous condensate (PAC) for short-chain carboxylates production. To evaluate relevant process parameters for mixed culture co-fermentation of syngas and PAC, two identical reactors were run under mesophilic (37 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) conditions at increasing PAC loading rates. Both the mesophilic and the thermophilic process recovered at least 50% of the energy in syngas and PAC into short-chain carboxylates. During the mesophilic syngas and PAC co-fermentation, methanogenesis was completely inhibited while acetate, ethanol and butyrate were the primary metabolites. Over 90% of the amplicon sequencing variants based on 16S rRNA were assigned to Clostridium sensu stricto 12. During the thermophilic process, on the other hand, Symbiobacteriales, Syntrophaceticus, Thermoanaerobacterium, Methanothermobacter and Methanosarcina likely played crucial roles in aromatics degradation and methanogenesis, respectively, while Moorella thermoacetica and Methanothermobacter marburgensis were the predominant carboxydotrophs in the thermophilic process. High biomass concentrations were necessary to maintain stable process operations at high PAC loads. In a second-stage reactor, Aspergillus oryzae converted acetate, propionate and butyrate from the first stage into L-malate, confirming the successful detoxification of PAC below inhibitory levels. The highest L-malate yield was 0.26 ± 2.2 mol

Indexed as

Carbon captureDetoxificationEnergy recoveryGas fermentationMixed culturesPyrolysis wastewater

Identifiers

PMID38907325
PMCPMC11191387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.