Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38907297›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2024

The impact of the expanded health insurance coverage policy on healthcare spending: evidence from Korea.

Seokmin Ji, Munjae Lee, Mankyu Choi, Sewon Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seokmin Ji *Department of Health Policy & Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-7835
Munjae Lee *Department of Medical Science, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9781-4187
Mankyu Choi *Department of Health Policy & Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea. mkchoi@korea.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-8195
Sewon Park *Department of Medical Science, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 16499, South Korea. parksewon@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-2661-7020

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2023S1A3A2A05095298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Korea's National Health Insurance (NHI) system pursues universal health coverage, but it has not been able to alleviate patients' financial burden owing to limited coverage and a high proportion of out-of-pocket expenses. In 2017, the government announced a plan to strengthen universality by providing coverage for all unincluded services, expanding coverage, and alleviating household financial burden. We aimed to evaluate the effect of "Moon Care" with a focus on changes in health expenditures following policy implementation, and to provide empirical evidence for future policies to strengthen the NHI system's universality.

methodsUsing data from the 2016 and 2018 Korea Health Panel (KHP), we established a treatment group affected by the policy and an unaffected control group; we ensured homogeneity between the groups using propensity score matching (PSM). Subsequently, we examined changes in NHI payments, non-payments, and out-of-pocket payments (OOP); we performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to evaluate the policy's effect.

resultsFollowing policy implementation, the control group had a higher increase than the treatment group in all categories of health expenditures, including NHI payments, non-payments, and OOP. We noted significant decreases in all three categories of health expenditures when comparing the differences before and after policy implementation, as well as between the treatment and control groups. However, we witnessed a significant decrease in the interaction term, which confirms the policy's effect, but only for non-payments.

conclusionsWe observed the policy's intervention effect over time as a decrease in non-payments, on the effectivity of remunerating covered medical services. However, the policy did not work for NHI payments and OOP, suggesting that it failed to control the creation of new non-covered services as noncovered services were converted into covered ones. Thus, it is crucial to discuss the financial spending of health insurance regarding the inclusion of non-covered services in the NHI benefits package.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresAdultFemaleHealth PolicyHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsRepublic of KoreaUniversal Health InsuranceDifference-in-differencesHealth expendituresHealth insurance coverageNational health insurance (NHI)Policy evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38907297
PMCPMC11191158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.