Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38907066›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Yuan-Shun Lo, Chia-Yu Lin, Chun Tseng, Pang-Hsuan Hsiao, Chien-Ying Lai, Ling-Yi Li, Hsien-Te Chen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Added Value and the Efficacy of Preoperative Physiotherapy on Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Preoperative BMI-adjusted sarcopenia defined by AWGS 2025 is associated with 1-year changes in the patient-reported outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael Jian-Wen ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yuan-Shun LoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chia-Yu LinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chun TsengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Pang-Hsuan HsiaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chien-Ying LaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ling-Yi LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsien-Te ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. bonekid1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to consolidate the evidence regarding the prognostic influence of sarcopenia in degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.

methodsA literature search of public databases was conducted up to Nov 15, 2023 using combinations of the key words "sarcopenia" and "lumbar spine surgery". Eligible studies were those that focused on adults undergoing decompression or fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases, and compared the outcomes between patients with and without preoperative sarcopenia. Primary outcomes were change in ODI and back and leg pain VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes were changes in Eq. 5D, JOA, SFHS-p scores, and LOS.

resultsUltimately, nine retrospective studies with a total of 993 patients were included. Sarcopenic patients exhibited significantly worse functional improvement as assessed by ODI compared to non-sarcopenic patients (pooled standardized mean difference [pSMD] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.90). Back pain (pSMD = 0.31, 95% CI:0.15-0.47) and leg pain (pSMD = 0.21, 95% CI:0.02 - 0.39) improvement were also less in sarcopenic patients. Non-sarcopenic patients had greater improvements in Eq. 5D (pSMD = 0.25) and SFHS-p (pSMD = 0.39), and shorter LOS (pSMD = 0.62).

conclusionsAs compared to patients without sarcopenia, those with sarcopenia undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative diseases have lower improvements in functional ability, quality of life, physical health, pain relief and extended hospitalization compared to those without sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSarcopeniaDecompression, SurgicalHumansSpinal FusionTreatment OutcomeDegenerative lumbar spine diseaseQuality of lifeSarcopeniaSpine surgerySystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.