ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024
Selection against domestication alleles in introduced rabbit populations.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compounding Impacts-Genomic Exploration of the Potential Effect of Domestic Introgression on Climate Adaptation in Atlantic Salmon (Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Haploblocks contribute to parallel climate adaptation following global invasion of a cosmopolitan plant.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- The Impact of Sequencing and Genotyping Errors on Bayesian Analysis of Genomic Data under the Multispecies Coalescent Model.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- From wild to domestic and in between: how domestication and feralization changed the morphology of rabbits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Adaptive genomic signatures of globally invasive populations of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Population Genetic Analysis of Wild and Domestic Rabbit Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Will a plant germplasm accession conserved in a genebank change genetically over time?Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans have moved domestic animals around the globe for thousands of years. These have occasionally established feral populations in nature, often with devastating ecological consequences. To understand how natural selection shapes re-adaptation into the wild, we investigated one of the most successful colonizers in history, the European rabbit. By sequencing the genomes of 297 rabbits across three continents, we show that introduced populations exhibit a mixed wild-domestic ancestry. We show that alleles that increased in frequency during domestication were preferentially selected against in novel natural environments. Interestingly, causative mutations for common domestication traits sometimes segregate at considerable frequencies if associated with less drastic phenotypes (for example, coat colour dilution), whereas mutations that are probably strongly maladaptive in nature are absent. Whereas natural selection largely targeted different genomic regions in each introduced population, some of the strongest signals of parallelism overlap genes associated with neuronal or brain function. This limited parallelism is probably explained by extensive standing genetic variation resulting from domestication together with the complex mixed ancestry of introduced populations. Our findings shed light on the selective and molecular mechanisms that enable domestic animals to re-adapt to the wild and provide important insights for the mitigation and management of invasive populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38907020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.