Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38906997›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2024

[Evidence-based psychotherapy of posttraumatic stress syndrome-An update].

Regina Steil, Andreas Maercker, Lena Jaworski, Rahel Bachem, David Eberle

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Regina SteilInstitut für Psychologie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Varrentrappstraße 40-42, 60486, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. steil@psych.uni-frankfurt.de.
Andreas MaerckerPsychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
Lena JaworskiInstitut für Psychologie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Varrentrappstraße 40-42, 60486, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Rahel BachemPsychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
David EberlePsychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this article is to summarize the current state of research on the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

methodsThe results of current meta-analyses and trend-setting individual studies are summarized and the most important forms of intervention are explained.

resultsThe psychotherapeutic treatment methods for PTSD are very effective, the effect sizes are large and superior to those of pharmacotherapy. Trauma exposure and cognitive restructuring are most effective. Trauma-focused procedures are generally superior to other forms of psychotherapy. A range of different cognitive behavioral procedures as well as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing are recommended. The most recent initial findings confirm a very good effectiveness for imagery rescripting methods as protective interventions without a formal confrontation with trauma. Individual therapy works better than group psychotherapy. In the group setting cognitive processing therapy has proven to be the best intervention. Trauma-focused treatment should also be used when comorbid conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or addiction are present. DISCUSSION: Trauma-focused psychotherapy in an individual setting is the treatment of choice for PTSD. A large selection of effective methods and well-reviewed manuals are available. The German language S3 guidelines are currently being updated.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyEvidence-Based MedicinePsychotherapyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticEye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingGermanyHumansTreatment OutcomeComorbid disordersEffectivenessGroup settingIndividual settingTrauma-focused psychotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.