ArticleScientific reports2024
Multi-step real-time prediction of hard-rock TBM penetration rate combining temporal convolutional network and squeeze-and-excitation block.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tunnel face rock mass class rapid identification based on TBM cutterhead vibration monitoring and deep learning model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate penetration rate prediction enhances rock-breaking efficiency and reduces disc cutter damage in tunnel boring machine (TBM) construction. However, this process faces significant challenges such as the high uncertainty of ground conditions and the complexity of maintaining optimal TBM operation in long and large tunnels. To address these challenges, we propose TCN-SENet++, a novel hybrid multistep real-time penetration rate prediction model that combines a temporal convolutional network (TCN) and a squeeze-and-excitation (SENet) block for aided tunneling. This study aims to demonstrate the application of TCN-SENet++, as well as other models such as RNN, LSTM, GRU, and TCN, for TBM penetration rate prediction. The model was developed using actual datasets collected from the Yin-Song diversion project. We employ a 30-s time step to predict the future time steps of the penetration rate (1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th). The features that influence the penetration rate, such as the cutterhead torque, thrust, and cutterhead power, were considered. A comparative analysis using the mean absolute error and mean squared error revealed that the TCN-SENet++ model outperformed the other models, including RNN, LSTM, GRU, TCN, and TCN-SENet+. In comparison, TCN-SENet++ achieved average MSE reductions of 18%, 6%, 3%, 1%, and 2%, respectively. The TCN-SENet++ model demonstrated fewer errors in the new project, validating its effectiveness and suitability for real-time penetration rate prediction in TBM construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.