ArticleScientific reports2024
A Mendelian randomization study between metabolic syndrome and its components with prostate cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Dysfunction After Initiation of Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2026Article
- Sex-specific Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study of basal metabolic rate.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From obesity to inflammation: emerging frontiers in prostate cancer and metabolic syndrome studies.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Metabolic syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Bioinformatics analysis of ERCC family in pan-cancer and ERCC2 in bladder cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has produced inconsistent findings concerning the connection between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer. It is challenging for observational studies to establish a conclusive causal relationship between the two. However, Mendelian randomization can provide stronger evidence of causality in this context. To examine the causal link between a metabolic composite and its components with prostate cancer, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study utilizing aggregated data from genome-wide association studies, followed by meta-analyses. In our study, we employed inverse variance weighting as the primary method for MR analysis. Additionally, we assessed potential sources of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy through the Cochran's Q test and MR-Egger regression. Moreover, we used multivariate MR to determine whether smoking versus alcohol consumption had an effect on the outcomes. We found no causal relationship between metabolic syndrome and its components and prostate cancer(MetS, odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.738-1.223, p = 0.691; TG, [OR] = 1.02, 95%[CI] = 0.96-1.08, p = 0.59); HDL, [OR] = 1.02, 95% [CI] = 0.97-1.07, p = 0.47; DBP, [OR] = 1.00, 95%[CI] = 0.99-1.01, p = 0.87; SBP, [OR] = 1.00, 95%[CI] = 0.99-1.00, p = 0.26; FBG [OR] = 0.92, 95%[CI] = 0.81-1.05, p = 0.23; WC, [OR] = 0.93, 95%[CI] = 0.84-1.03, p = 0.16). Finally, the MVMR confirms that the metabolic syndrome and its components are independent of smoking and alcohol consumption in prostate cancer. We didn't find significant evidence to determine a causal relationship between the metabolic syndrome and its components and prostate cancer through MR analysis. Further research is necessary to explore the potential pathogenesis between the two diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.