Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38906888›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

When population growth intensifies intergroup competition, female colobus monkeys free-ride less.

T Jean Arseneau-Robar, Julie A Teichroeb, Andrew J J Macintosh, Tania L Saj, Emily Glotfelty, Sara Lucci, Pascale Sicotte, Eva C Wikberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intergroup Encounters Among Wild White-Faced Capuchins (International journal of primatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T Jean Arseneau-RobarDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada. arseneau.jean.m@gmail.com.
Julie A TeichroebDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.
Andrew J J MacintoshWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tania L SajDepartment of Anthropology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Emily GlotfeltyDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Sara LucciDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Pascale SicotteDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Eva C WikbergDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, USA. eva.wikberg@utsa.edu.

Funding

Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures 200600343Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-203059-2006Wenner-Gren Foundation 8172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intergroup aggression often results in the production of public goods, such as a safe and stable social environment and a home range containing the resources required to survive and reproduce. We investigate temporal variation in intergroup aggression in a growing population of colobus monkeys (Colobus vellerosus) to ask a novel question: "Who stepped-up to produce these public goods when doing so became more difficult?". Both whole-group encounters and male incursions occurred more frequently as the population grew. Males and females were both more likely to participate in whole-group encounters when monopolizable food resources were available, indicating both sexes engaged in food defence. However, only females increasingly did so as the population grew, suggesting that it was females who increasingly produced the public good of home range defence as intergroup competition intensified. Females were also more active in male incursions at high population densities, suggesting they increasingly produced the public good of a safe and stable social environment. This is not to say that males were chronic free-riders when it came to maintaining public goods. Males consistently participated in the majority of intergroup interactions throughout the study period, indicating they may have lacked the capacity to invest more time and effort.

Indexed as

AggressionColobusPopulation GrowthAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCompetitive BehaviorFemaleMaleSocial BehaviorFood defenceIntergroup conflictPopulation densityPublic goodVolunteer’s dilemma

Identifiers

PMID38906888
PMCPMC11192885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.