Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38906868›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2024

Smartphone-based study reminders can be a double-edged sword.

Lea Nobbe, Jasmin Breitwieser, Daniel Biedermann, Garvin Brod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea NobbeEducation and Human Development, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. l.nobbe@dipf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5400-1952
Jasmin BreitwieserEducation and Human Development, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-7159
Daniel BiedermannInformation Center for Education, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9219-222X
Garvin BrodEducation and Human Development, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-5609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reminders are a popular feature in smartphone apps designed to promote desirable behaviors that are best performed regularly. But can they also promote students' regular studying? In the present study with 85 lower secondary school students aged 10-12, we combined a smartphone-based between- and within-person experimental manipulation with logfile data of a vocabulary learning app. Students were scheduled to receive reminders on 16 days during the 36-day intervention period. Findings suggest that reminders can be a double-edged sword. The within-person experimental manipulation allowed a comparison of study probability on days with and without reminders. Students were more likely to study on days they received a reminder compared to days when they did not receive a reminder. However, when compared to a control group that never received reminders, the effect was not due to students studying more frequently on days with reminders. Instead, they studied less frequently on days without reminders than students in the control group. This effect increased over the study period, with students becoming increasingly less likely to study on days without reminders. Taken together, these results suggest a detrimental side effect of reminders: students become overly reliant on them.

Identifiers

PMID38906868
PMCPMC11192903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.