Observational studyRespiratory care2024
Maintenance Inhalers for Asthma and COPD in Spain.
Observational study in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to describe the use of pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in Spanish subjects in terms of sociodemographic, clinical, and functional characteristics in subjects with asthma or COPD on maintenance treatment with inhaled therapy.
methodsThis was a retrospective, descriptive, national, multi-center, and observational study using a database with 1.8 million patients from hospitals and primary care centers as a secondary information source.
resultsThe sample included 24,102 subjects with asthma on maintenance therapy (26.0% with pMDI, 55% with DPI, and 19.0% with a combination of DPI + pMDI inhalers) and 12,858 subjects with COPD on maintenance therapy (26% with pMDI; 39% with DPI; and 35% with a combination of pMDI + DPI inhalers, mostly extemporary triple therapy). In proportion, subjects ≥ 75 y old used more pMDI than DPI, while younger subjects (40-64 y old) used more DPI. An inhalation chamber was prescribed in 51.0% of subjects with asthma and 47.2% of subjects with COPD treated with pMDI. The use of an inhalation chamber increases with the degree of air-flow limitation by disease and age. In subjects with comorbidities, pMDI inhaler use increased in those ≥ 75 y old for subjects with asthma and subjects with COPD. Switching from pMDI to DPI and vice versa was relatively common: 25% of subjects with asthma and 21.6% of subjects with COPD treated with pMDI had switched from DPI in the previous year. On the contrary, 14.1% and 11.4% of subjects with asthma and subjects with COPD, respectively, treated with DPI had switched from pMDI the last year.
conclusionsThe use of pMDI or DPI can vary according to age, both in asthma and COPD. Switching from pMDI to DPI and vice versa is relatively common. Despite the availability of dual- and triple-therapy inhalers on the market, a considerable number of subjects were treated with multiple devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.