Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38906675›Full record

ArticleLife science alliance2024

The type of DNA damage response after decitabine treatment depends on the level of DNMT activity.

Tina Aumer, Maike Däther, Linda Bergmayr, Stephanie Kartika, Theodor Zeng, Qingyi Ge, Grazia Giorgio, Alexander J Hess, Stylianos Michalakis, Franziska R Traube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life science alliance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tina AumerInstitute of Chemical Epigenetics Munich, Department of Chemistry, University of Munich (LMU), München, Germany.
Maike DätherInstitute of Chemical Epigenetics Munich, Department of Chemistry, University of Munich (LMU), München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7423-0613
Linda BergmayrTUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-1331-092X
Stephanie KartikaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Munich (LMU), München, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-6728-3239
Theodor ZengTUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-4842-3681
Qingyi GeTUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-7922-6749
Grazia GiorgioDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Alexander J HessTUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-8077-438X
Stylianos MichalakisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-9238
Franziska R TraubeInstitute of Chemical Epigenetics Munich, Department of Chemistry, University of Munich (LMU), München, Germany franziska.traube@ibtb.uni-stuttgart.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-1941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decitabine and azacytidine are considered as epigenetic drugs that induce DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)-DNA crosslinks, resulting in DNA hypomethylation and damage. Although they are already applied against myeloid cancers, important aspects of their mode of action remain unknown, highly limiting their clinical potential. Using a combinatorial approach, we reveal that the efficacy profile of both compounds primarily depends on the level of induced DNA damage. Under low DNMT activity, only decitabine has a substantial impact. Conversely, when DNMT activity is high, toxicity and cellular response to both compounds are dramatically increased, but do not primarily depend on DNA hypomethylation or RNA-associated processes. By investigating proteome dynamics on chromatin, we show that decitabine induces a strictly DNMT-dependent multifaceted DNA damage response based on chromatin recruitment, but not expression-level changes of repair-associated proteins. The choice of DNA repair pathway hereby depends on the severity of decitabine-induced DNA lesions. Although under moderate DNMT activity, mismatch (MMR), base excision (BER), and Fanconi anaemia-dependent DNA repair combined with homologous recombination are activated in response to decitabine, high DNMT activity and therefore immense replication stress induce activation of MMR and BER followed by non-homologous end joining.

Indexed as

AzacitidineDecitabineDNA DamageDNA MethylationDNA RepairAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell Line, TumorChromatinDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Modification MethylasesHumansAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAzacitidineChromatinDecitabineDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Modification Methylases

Identifiers

PMID38906675
PMCPMC11192838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.