Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38906674›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

NeuroMix with MRA: A Fast MR Protocol to Reduce Head and Neck CTA for Patients with Acute Neurologic Presentations.

Johannes H Decker, Alexander T Mazal, Amy Bui, Tim Sprenger, Stefan Skare, Nancy Fischbein, Greg Zaharchuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johannes H DeckerFrom the Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (J.H.D., A.T.M., A.B., N.F., G.Z.), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California jhdecker@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4143-2673
Alexander T MazalFrom the Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (J.H.D., A.T.M., A.B., N.F., G.Z.), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Amy BuiFrom the Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (J.H.D., A.T.M., A.B., N.F., G.Z.), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0009-0002-6237-9039
Tim SprengerMR Applied Science Laboratory Europe (T.S.), GE Healthcare, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan SkareDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience (T.S., S.S.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5403-2153
Nancy FischbeinFrom the Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (J.H.D., A.T.M., A.B., N.F., G.Z.), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2895-3586
Greg ZaharchukFrom the Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (J.H.D., A.T.M., A.B., N.F., G.Z.), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-8848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeOveruse of CT-based cerebrovascular imaging in the emergency department and inpatient settings, notably CTA of the head and neck for minor and nonfocal neurologic presentations, stresses imaging services and exposes patients to radiation and contrast. Furthermore, such CT-based imaging is often insufficient for definitive diagnosis, necessitating additional MR imaging. Recent advances in fast MRI may allow timely assessment and a reduced need for head and neck CTA in select populations. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified inpatients or patients in the emergency department who underwent CTAHN (including noncontrast and postcontrast head CT, with or without CTP imaging) followed within 24 hours by a 3T MRI study that included a 2.5-minute unenhanced multicontrast sequence (NeuroMix) and a 5-minute intracranial time of flight MRA) during a 9-month period (April to December 2022). Cases were classified by 4 radiologists in consensus as to whether NeuroMix and NeuroMix + MRA detected equivalent findings, detected unique findings, or missed findings relative to CTAHN.

resultsOne hundred seventy-four cases (mean age, 67 [SD, 16] years; 56% female) met the inclusion criteria. NeuroMix alone and NeuroMix + MRA protocols were determined to be equivalent or better compared with CTAHN in 71% and 95% of patients, respectively. NeuroMix always provided equivalent or better assessment of the brain parenchyma, with unique findings on NeuroMix and NeuroMix + MRA in 35% and 36% of cases, respectively, most commonly acute infarction or multiple microhemorrhages. In 8/174 cases (5%), CTAHN identified vascular abnormalities not seen on the NeuroMix + MRA protocol due to the wider coverage of the cervical arteries by CTAHN.

conclusionsA fast MR imaging protocol consisting of NeuroMix + MRA provided equivalent or better information compared with CTAHN in 95% of cases in our population of patients with an acute neurologic presentation. The findings provide a deeper understanding of the benefits and challenges of a fast unenhanced MR-first approach with NeuroMix + MRA, which could be used to design prospective trials in select patient groups, with the potential to reduce radiation dose, mitigate adverse contrast-related patient and environmental effects, and lessen the burden on radiologists and health care systems.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebrovascular DisordersFemaleHeadHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeckRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38906674
PMCPMC11543087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.