ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024
A simple MATLAB toolbox for analyzing calcium imaging data in vitro and in vivo.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multicellular analysis calcium imaging toolbox for ImageJ.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- A Semi-Automatic Tool for the Standardized Analysis of Fluorescent Intensity Changes in Polarized Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Enteric glial S100B controls rhythmic colonic functions by regulating excitability and specificity in gut motor neurocircuits.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Ex vivo calcium imaging of sympathetic neurons in intact mouse stellate ganglia.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience: Transformative Synergies in Brain Research and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- FluoAnalysis: An Open-Source MATLAB Toolbox for Analysis of Calcium Imaging Measurements of Oscillatory Astrocytic and Neuronal Networks.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFluorescence imaging of calcium dynamics in neuronal populations is powerful because it offers a way of relating the activity of individual cells to the broader population of nearby cells. The method's growth across neuroscience has particularly been driven by the introduction of sophisticated mathematical techniques related to motion correction, image registration, cell detection, spike estimation, and population characterization. However, for many researchers, making good use of these techniques has been difficult because they have been devised by different workers and impose differing - and sometimes stringent - technical requirements on those who seek to use them. NEW
methodWe have built a simple toolbox of analysis routines that encompass the complete workflow for analyzing calcium imaging data. The workflow begins with preprocessing of data, includes motion correction and longitudinal image registration, detects active cells using constrained non-negative matrix factorization, and offers multiple options for estimating spike times and characterizing population activity. The routines can be navigated through a simple graphical user interface. Although written in MATLAB, a standalone version for researchers who do not have access to MATLAB is included.
resultsWe have used the toolbox on two very different preparations: spontaneously active brain slices and microendoscopic imaging from deep structures in awake behaving mice. In both cases, the toolbox offered a seamless flow from raw data all the way through to prepared graphs.
conclusionThe field of calcium imaging has benefited from the development of numerous innovative mathematical techniques. Here we offer a simple toolbox that allows ordinary researchers to fully exploit these techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.