Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38905455›Full record

SynthesisJournal of perinatal medicine2024

Prevention of preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Henrique G Provinciatto, Maria E Barbalho, Laura F Crosara, Pedro V B Orsini, Alexandre Provinciatto, Chris E Philip, Rodrigo Ruano, Edward Araujo Júnior

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of perinatal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Henrique G ProvinciattoDepartment of Medicine, Barão de Maua University Center, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6376-0305
Maria E BarbalhoDepartment of Medicine, Potiguar University (UnP), Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2444-6231
Laura F CrosaraDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8632-4635
Pedro V B OrsiniDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5450-6118
Alexandre ProvinciattoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Medical, Limeira, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8980-2606
Chris E PhilipDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4375-9522
Rodrigo RuanoDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-5858
Edward Araujo JúniorDepartment of Obstetrics, 58804 Paulista School of Medicine - Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP) , São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-2532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.

methodsPubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to December 2023 with no filters. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually examined to identify any supplementary studies. We selected randomized controlled trials and cohorts comparing interventions to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio version 4.3.1. Randomized controlled trials and cohorts were assessed respectively using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions tool and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.

resultsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included eight studies comprising a total of 719 patients. Compared with expectant management, cerclage stood out as the only intervention associated with an increase in the survival of at least one twin (risk ratio 1.12; 95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Our subgroup analysis based on different thresholds for short cervix demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 32 weeks with ultrasound-indicated cerclage using a 15 mm criterion (risk ratio 0.65; 95 % confidence interval 0.47-0.92).

conclusionsOur study suggests the potential benefit of cerclage as a preventive strategy for preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. These findings highlight the necessity for further investigation to corroborate our results and address the optimal threshold for ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

Indexed as

Fetofetal TransfusionPremature BirthCerclage, CervicalFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy, Twincerclagepessaryprematurityprogesteronetwin pregnancytwin-to-twin transfusion syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.