Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38905350›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Carbonated magmatic sulfide systems: Still or sparkling?

Maria Cherdantseva, Michael Anenburg, Marco Fiorentini, John Mavrogenes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria CherdantsevaCentre for Exploration Targeting, School of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, 6009 Crawley, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2021-9838
Michael AnenburgResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-3087
Marco FiorentiniCentre for Exploration Targeting, School of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, 6009 Crawley, Perth, WA, Australia.
John MavrogenesResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-2900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, there has been debate surrounding the transport of dense metal-rich sulfide liquid in mafic magmas. This topic is crucial to understanding the genesis of valuable resources of nickel, copper, and platinum-group elements, which are essential for a sustainable, emission-free energy future. Recent studies of mineralized mafic magmas suggested that gas bubbles adhere to sulfide globules, reducing their density and favoring upward transport. While this hypothesis may explain sulfide mobility in near-surface magmatic environments, it is at odds with key mineralogic and textural observations and does not explain how long-distance sulfide transport operates. Here, we suggest an alternative hypothesis that builds on previous observations, focusing on the interaction between carbonate melt and sulfide liquid. We demonstrate experimentally that carbonate melt wraps sulfide globules forming a relatively mobile pair that may mediate metal-rich sulfide transport from mantle to crust.

Identifiers

PMID38905350
PMCPMC11192084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.