ArticlePloS one2024
Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the Amsterdam UMCdb intensive care dataset.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mortality effect of albumin fluid resuscitation in adults with septic shock: a systematic review and dual frequentist-bayesian meta-analysis of randomised trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- What is the ideal glucose range for a patient with sepsis in the ICU? A retrospective analysis of MIMIC-IV.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the updated, 2016 Sepsis-3 criteria, sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, where organ dysfunction can be represented by an increase in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or more. We sought to apply the Sepsis-3 criteria to characterise the septic cohort in the Amsterdam University Medical Centres database (Amsterdam UMCdb).
methodsWe examined adult intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in the Amsterdam UMCdb, which contains de-identified data for patients admitted to a mixed surgical-medical ICU at a tertiary academic medical centre in the Netherlands. We operationalised the Sepsis-3 criteria, defining organ dysfunction as an increase in the SOFA score of 2 points or more, while infection was defined as a new course of antibiotics or an escalation in antibiotic therapy, with at least one antibiotic given intravenously. Patients with sepsis were determined to be in septic shock if they additionally required the use of vasopressors and had a lactate level >2 mmol/L.
resultsWe identified 18,221 ICU admissions from 16,408 patients in our cohort. There were 6,312 unique sepsis episodes, of which 30.2% met the criteria for septic shock. A total of 4,911/6,312 sepsis (77.8%) episodes occurred on ICU admission. Forty-seven percent of emergency medical admissions and 36.7% of emergency surgical admissions were for sepsis. Overall, there was a 12.5% ICU mortality rate; patients with septic shock had a higher ICU mortality rate (38.4%) than those without shock (11.4%).
conclusionsWe successfully operationalised the Sepsis-3 criteria to the Amsterdam UMCdb, allowing the characterization and comparison of sepsis epidemiology across different centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.