Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38905248›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Investigating psychobiological causes and mechanisms in functional seizures and functional motor symptoms: Study protocol.

Susannah Pick, Anthony S David, Mark J Edwards, Laura H Goldstein, John Hodsoll, L S Merritt Millman, Timothy R Nicholson, A A T S Reinders, Biba Stanton, Joel S Winston and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Susannah PickInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2001-6723
Anthony S DavidInstutite of Mental Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark J EdwardsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura H GoldsteinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
John HodsollInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
L S Merritt MillmanInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Timothy R NicholsonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
A A T S ReindersInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Biba StantonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joel S WinstonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mitul A MehtaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1152-5323
Trudie ChalderInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew HotopfInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvances have been made in understanding the aetiology of functional neurological disorder (FND); however, its pathophysiological mechanisms have not been definitively demonstrated. Evidence suggests interacting roles for altered emotional processing and interoception, elevated autonomic arousal, and dissociation, but there is limited evidence demonstrating their causal influence on specific FND symptoms. Our superordinate aim is to elucidate potentially shared and distinct aetiological factors and mechanisms in two common FND subtypes, functional seizures (FS) and functional motor symptoms (FMS).

methodsThis study has a multimodal, mixed between- and within-groups design. The target sample is 50 individuals with FS, 50 with FMS, 50 clinical controls (anxiety/depression), and 50 healthy controls. Potential aetiological factors (e.g., adverse life events, physical/mental health symptoms, dissociative tendencies, interoceptive insight/sensibility) will be assessed with a detailed medical history interview and self-report questionnaires. A laboratory session will include a neurocognitive battery, psychophysiological testing, cardiac interoception and time estimation tasks and an isometric handgrip task. A subsample will undergo magnetic resonance imaging, including structural, resting-state and task-based scans combined with psychophysiological recording. Remote monitoring with ecological momentary assessment and wearables will measure variability in FND symptoms and their potential predictors/correlates for ≥2 weeks in patients' daily lives. Longitudinal follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12-months will monitor longer-term outcomes in the clinical groups. DISCUSSION: This study employs multimodal research methods to rigorously examine several putative mechanisms in FND, at subjective/experiential, behavioural, and physiological levels. The study will test causal hypotheses about the role of altered emotional processing, autonomic arousal, dissociation and interoception in the initiation or exacerbation of FND symptoms, directly comparing these processes in FS and FMS to healthy and clinical controls. This is the first study of its kind, with potential to reveal important targets for prevention and treatment of FND in future.

Indexed as

SeizuresAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInteroceptionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38905248
PMCPMC11192335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.