Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38905190›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Development of a low-cost robotized 3D-prototype for automated optical microscopy diagnosis: An open-source system.

Allisson Dantas de Oliveira, Carles Rubio Maturana, Francesc Zarzuela Serrat, Bruno Motta Carvalho, Elena Sulleiro, Clara Prats, Anna Veiga, Mercedes Bosch, Javier Zulueta, Alberto Abelló and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Allisson Dantas de OliveiraComputational Biology and Complex Systems Group, Physics Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Castelldefels, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8267-9760
Carles Rubio MaturanaMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5615-9278
Francesc Zarzuela SerratMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Bruno Motta CarvalhoDepartment of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Elena SulleiroMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Clara PratsComputational Biology and Complex Systems Group, Physics Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Castelldefels, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-7559
Anna VeigaProbitas Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercedes BoschProbitas Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier ZuluetaProbitas Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto AbellóDatabase Technologies and Information Group, Service and Information Systems Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Elisa SayrolTecnocampus, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Mataró, Spain.
Joan Joseph-MunnéMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel López-CodinaComputational Biology and Complex Systems Group, Physics Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Castelldefels, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a clinical context, conventional optical microscopy is commonly used for the visualization of biological samples for diagnosis. However, the availability of molecular techniques and rapid diagnostic tests are reducing the use of conventional microscopy, and consequently the number of experienced professionals starts to decrease. Moreover, the continuous visualization during long periods of time through an optical microscope could affect the final diagnosis results due to induced human errors and fatigue. Therefore, microscopy automation is a challenge to be achieved and address this problem. The aim of the study is to develop a low-cost automated system for the visualization of microbiological/parasitological samples by using a conventional optical microscope, and specially designed for its implementation in resource-poor settings laboratories. A 3D-prototype to automate the majority of conventional optical microscopes was designed. Pieces were built with 3D-printing technology and polylactic acid biodegradable material with Tinkercad/Ultimaker Cura 5.1 slicing softwares. The system's components were divided into three subgroups: microscope stage pieces, storage/autofocus-pieces, and smartphone pieces. The prototype is based on servo motors, controlled by Arduino open-source electronic platform, to emulate the X-Y and auto-focus (Z) movements of the microscope. An average time of 27.00 ± 2.58 seconds is required to auto-focus a single FoV. Auto-focus evaluation demonstrates a mean average maximum Laplacian value of 11.83 with tested images. The whole automation process is controlled by a smartphone device, which is responsible for acquiring images for further diagnosis via convolutional neural networks. The prototype is specially designed for resource-poor settings, where microscopy diagnosis is still a routine process. The coalescence between convolutional neural network predictive models and the automation of the movements of a conventional optical microscope confer the system a wide range of image-based diagnosis applications. The accessibility of the system could help improve diagnostics and provide new tools to laboratories worldwide.

Indexed as

MicroscopyAutomationHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrinting, Three-DimensionalRoboticsSmartphoneSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38905190
PMCPMC11192333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.