Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38905047›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024

A Critical Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Technologies in Alzheimer's Dementia and Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Christian LoBue, Shawn M McClintock, Hsueh-Sheng Chiang, Jessica Helphrey, Vishal J Thakkar, John Hart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of transcranial alternating current stimulation on cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian LoBueDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Shawn M McClintockDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Hsueh-Sheng ChiangDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jessica HelphreyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Vishal J ThakkarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
John HartDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

4/4-Deciphering Mechanisms of ECT Outcomes and Adverse Effects (DECODE)R01MH128691 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Shawn M McClintock · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Pathways Relating Amnestic MCI to a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury History (PATH)K23AG075261 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Christian Barrett LoBue · 2022 to 2026
$675k
Emotional Cognition: Establishing Constructs and Neural-Behavioral Mechanisms in Older Adults with Depression (ENSURE)R21MH130870 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREER, TRACY L., MCCLINTOCK, SHAWN M · 2023 to 2024
$456k
Using High Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Guided by Electrophysiology and Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Treat Verbal Retrieval Deficits Secondary to Chronic Traumatic Brain InjuryK99DC020185 · NIDCD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHIANG, HSUEH-SHENG · 2023 to 2024
$209k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG075261NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC020185NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128691NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH130870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple pharmacologic agents now have been approved in the United States and other countries as treatment to slow disease and clinical progression for Alzheimer's disease. Given these treatments have not been proven to lessen the cognitive deficits already manifested in the Alzheimer's Clinical Syndrome (ACS), and none are aimed for another debilitating dementia syndrome identified as primary progressive aphasia (PPA), there is an urgent need for new, safe, tolerable, and efficacious treatments to mitigate the cognitive deficits experienced in ACS and PPA. Noninvasive brain stimulation has shown promise for enhancing cognitive functioning, and there has been interest in its potential therapeutic value in ACS and PPA. This review critically examines the evidence of five technologies in ACS and PPA: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS). Many randomized controlled trials of tDCS and rTMS report positive treatment effects on cognition in ACS and PPA that persist out to at least 8 weeks, whereas there are few trials for tACS and none for tRNS and nVNS. However, most positive trials did not identify clinically meaningful changes, underscoring that clinical efficacy has yet to be established in ACS and PPA. Much is still to be learned about noninvasive brain stimulation in ACS and PPA, and shifting the focus to prioritize clinical significance in addition to statistical significance in trials could yield greater success in understanding its potential cognitive effects and optimal parameters.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAphasia, Primary ProgressiveTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBrainHumansVagus Nerve StimulationAlzheimer’s diseaseprimary progressive aphasiarandomized controlled trialsemantic dementiatranscranial electrical stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38905047
PMCPMC11959453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.