ArticleJAMA health forum2024
Racial and Ethnic and Rural Variations in Access to Primary Care for Veterans Following the MISSION Act.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Equity and Cancer Survival Among Veterans Health Administration Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Racial and ethnic disparities in GLP-1 prescriptions among veterans with obesity across direct and community care settings.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- The telehealth engagement measure: a proportions-based measure of care delivered via video and phone for research, clinical, and policy assessments.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Use of VA Facility and VA-Purchased Behavioral Health Services Among Post-9/11 Veterans With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Rural Veterans Using VA Video-to-Home Telehealth or Community Care Network for Mental Healthcare.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- VA Clinicians' Perspectives on Low-Value Health Service Use in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Access to Care and Services Among U.S. Rural Veterans With and Without Disabilities: A National Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies and Pain: Delivery Through Veterans Affairs and Community Care.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
- A Longitudinal Evaluation of a Novel Short-Term Staffing and Telehealth Program: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of primary care & community healthObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The 2018 Veterans Affairs Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (VA MISSION) Act was implemented to increase timely access to care by expanding veterans' opportunities to receive Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care in the community (community care [CC]). Because health equity is a major VA priority, it is important to know whether Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans experienced equitable access to primary care within the VA MISSION Act. Objective: To examine whether utilization of and wait times for primary care differed between Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans in rural and urban areas after the implementation of the VA MISSION Act. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used VA and CC outpatient and consult data from the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse for fiscal years 2021 to 2022 (October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2022). Separate fixed-effects multivariable models were run to predict CC utilization and wait times. Each model was run twice, once comparing Black and White veterans and then comparing Hispanic and White veterans. Adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) were calculated for Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans within rurality status for both outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: VA and CC primary care utilization as measured by primary care visits (utilization cohort); VA and CC primary care access as measured by mean wait times (access cohort). Results: A total of 5 046 087 veterans (994 517 [19.7%] Black, 390 870 [7.7%] Hispanic, and 3 660 700 [72.6%] White individuals) used primary care from fiscal years 2021 to 2022. Utilization increased for all 3 racial and ethnicity groups, more so in CC than VA primary care. ARRs were significantly less than 1 regardless of rurality status, indicating Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans were less likely to utilize CC for primary care. There were 468 246 primary care consultations during the study period. The overall mean (SD) wait time was 33.3 (32.4) days. Despite decreases in wait times over time, primary care wait times remained longer in CC than in VA. Black veterans compared with White veterans had significantly longer wait times in CC (ARRs >1) but significantly shorter wait times in VA (ARRS <1) regardless of rurality status in VA and CC. CC wait times for Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans were longer in rural areas only and in VA rural and urban areas (ARRs >1). Conclusion and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that additional research should explore the determinants and implications of utilization differences among Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans. Efforts to promote equitable primary care access for all veterans are needed so that policy changes can be more effective in ensuring timely access to care for all veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.