ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
The serum LDH level and KELIM scores are potential predictors of a benefit from bevacizumab first-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactate and lactylation: mechanisms, function, diseases, and therapeutic targets.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio as a prognostic indicator for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio in first-line chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a nomogram for identifying the patients at risk for rapid progression of advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Bevacizumab in ovarian cancer therapy: current advances, clinical challenges, and emerging strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The application value of lactate dehydrogenase in gynecological malignant tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe survival benefit of first-line treatment with bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer patients are multifaceted. In our study, we aimed to identify potential markers of bevacizumab efficacy to help predict which patients would experience survival benefits.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 114 patients examined from January 1, 2015, to March 1, 2023, and data on clinical, biological, and imaging variables, such as ascites, serum LDH, and CA125, were extracted from electronic medical records. We performed a correlation analysis and principal component analysis to investigate correlations among variables and reduce their dimensionality. Then, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify the predictors of progression-free survival.
resultsFavorable KELIM score (≥ 1, HR 0.376, 95% CI [0.202-0.700], p = 0.002), which indicated better chemosensitivity, and lower LDH levels (≤ 210 U/L, HR 38.73, 95% CI [6.108-245.6], p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of a treatment benefit with bevacizumab in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Regardless of LDH level, patients with favorable KELIM scores had a higher progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (p = 0.18). Among patients with unfavorable KELIM scores, those with higher LDH levels had the lowest PFS benefit (median: 11.5 months, p = 0.0059).
conclusionPatients with poor chemosensitivity and low LDH levels are more likely to benefit from first-line bevacizumab treatment. The combination of the two markers can be a helpful predictor of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment and a guide for treatment decisions-making. Retrospectively registered: 2020-MD-371, 2020.10.12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38904923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.