Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904864›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

The relationship between medication beliefs, patient activation, and self-rated health in patients taking oral anticancer agents.

Misun Hwang, Youmin Cho, Yang Gong, Yun Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Patient symptoms, confidence, and adherence during the first 8 weeks of targeted oral anticancer agent treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. A latent profile analysis of patient activation in postoperative breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Misun HwangUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Youmin ChoChungnam National University College of Nursing, Daejeon, South Korea.
Yang GongMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yun JiangUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jiangyu@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-5016

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS027846AHRQ HHS R01HS027846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients on oral anticancer agent (OAA) therapies have the autonomy to manage their cancer treatments in home settings. However, patients may not have adequate knowledge, confidence, or ability to effectively manage OAA-related consequences, which can significantly impact their treatment and health outcomes. This study aims to identify the associations between medication beliefs, patient activation, and self-rated health (SRH) among oncology patients taking OAAs and explore the potential mediation effects of patient activation on the relationship between medication beliefs and SRH.

methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted on cross-sectional data from 114 patients who were diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Patients completed a self-reported survey including items of SRH, Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), and Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). Descriptive statistics, bivariate correlation, hierarchical multiple linear regression, and mediation analysis were conducted.

resultsThe results indicate that patients taking OAAs have ambivalent attitudes toward medication. Both medication necessity (r =  - 0.27) and concerns (r =  - 0.21) were negatively associated with SRH, while patient activation was positively associated with SRH (r = 0.38). Patient activation had a negative association with medication concerns (r =  - 0.36) and fully mediated the relationship between medication concerns and SRH in patients taking OAAs (indirect effect =  - 0.154, 95% confidence interval, - 0.276 to - 0.060).

conclusionThe findings highlight the significance of activating patients to better understand and manage their OAAs. It is crucial for oncology professionals to provide multifaceted interventions to promote patient activation with an effort to mitigate the negative impact of medication beliefs on patient-perceived health outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic AgentsMedication beliefsOral anticancer agentsPatient activationSelf-rated health

Identifiers

PMID38904864
PMCPMC11931441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.