ReviewMedical molecular morphology2024
Primary hepatobiliary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a case report and review of literature.
Review in Medical molecular morphology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma in rare locations: a report of two cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Rare Primary Hepatic Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Report of Two Cases.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatobiliary mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor comprising mucous, intermediate, and epidermoid cells. Herein, we presented a case of primary liver mucoepidermoid carcinoma preoperatively misdiagnosed as conventional intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A 67-year-old male was admitted to our hospital. Preoperative laboratory tests showed increased aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Abdominal Computer Tomography revealed a 4.8 × 4.9 cm liver mass in segment VI. A preliminary diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was made, with undergoing partial hepatectomy. However, on histopathology, the tumor comprised a mixture of epidermoid, mucous, and intermediate cells with diffuse infiltrating at the tumor margin. On special stains, mucous and intermedia cells were positive for mucicarmine and Alcian blue, whereas epidermoid cells were positive for Keratin 5/6 and p63. Intermediate cells are also positive for p63. All tumor cells were positive for Keratin 7. The Ki-67 index was 35%. The final diagnosis was primary hepatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Although rare, hepatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma should be considered in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma differential diagnosis. We reviewed previous studies and found that hepatobiliary mucoepidermoid carcinoma is more likely to originate from the biliary tract adjacent to the tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38904830What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.