ReviewActa neurochirurgica2024
Neurosurgery and the glymphatic system.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Central nervous system lymphatic network: from the maintenance of brain homeostasis to emerging therapeutic perspectives in neurodegenerative diseases.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- The electrofluidic brain as a basement layer for neural computation.Communications biology · 2026Review
- The Glymphatic System in Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics: Clinical Implications, Its Evaluation, and Application to Therapeutics.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of the glymphatic system has fundamentally altered our comprehension of cerebrospinal fluid transport and the removal of waste from brain metabolism. In the past decade, since its initial characterization, research on the glymphatic system has surged exponentially. Its potential implications for central nervous system disorders have sparked significant interest in the field of neurosurgery. Nonetheless, ongoing discussions and debates persist regarding the concept of the glymphatic system, and our current understanding largely relies on findings from experimental animal studies. This review aims to address several key inquiries: What methodologies exist for evaluating glymphatic function in humans today? What is the current evidence supporting the existence of a human glymphatic system? Can the glymphatic system be considered distinct from the meningeal-lymphatic system? What is the human evidence for glymphatic-meningeal lymphatic system failure in neurosurgical diseases? Existing literature indicates a paucity of techniques available for assessing glymphatic function in humans. Thus far, intrathecal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown the most promising results and have provided evidence for the presence of a glymphatic system in humans, albeit with limitations. It is, however, essential to recognize the interconnection between the glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic systems, as they operate in tandem. There are some human studies demonstrating deteriorations in glymphatic function associated with neurosurgical disorders, enriching our understanding of their pathophysiology. However, the translation of this knowledge into clinical practice is hindered by the constraints of current glymphatic imaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.