Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904802›Full record

ReviewActa neurochirurgica2024

Neurosurgery and the glymphatic system.

Per Kristian Eide

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Per Kristian EideDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Nydalen, Pb 4950 N-0424, Norway. p.k.eide@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0001-6881-9280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the glymphatic system has fundamentally altered our comprehension of cerebrospinal fluid transport and the removal of waste from brain metabolism. In the past decade, since its initial characterization, research on the glymphatic system has surged exponentially. Its potential implications for central nervous system disorders have sparked significant interest in the field of neurosurgery. Nonetheless, ongoing discussions and debates persist regarding the concept of the glymphatic system, and our current understanding largely relies on findings from experimental animal studies. This review aims to address several key inquiries: What methodologies exist for evaluating glymphatic function in humans today? What is the current evidence supporting the existence of a human glymphatic system? Can the glymphatic system be considered distinct from the meningeal-lymphatic system? What is the human evidence for glymphatic-meningeal lymphatic system failure in neurosurgical diseases? Existing literature indicates a paucity of techniques available for assessing glymphatic function in humans. Thus far, intrathecal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown the most promising results and have provided evidence for the presence of a glymphatic system in humans, albeit with limitations. It is, however, essential to recognize the interconnection between the glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic systems, as they operate in tandem. There are some human studies demonstrating deteriorations in glymphatic function associated with neurosurgical disorders, enriching our understanding of their pathophysiology. However, the translation of this knowledge into clinical practice is hindered by the constraints of current glymphatic imaging modalities.

Indexed as

Glymphatic SystemAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeningesNeurosurgical ProceduresCerebrospinal fluidGlymphatic systemMeningeal lymphatic vesselsMRINeurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38904802
PMCPMC11192689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.