Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904777›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Feasibility assessment of catheter-free water vapor thermal therapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Vi Nguyen, Joshua Winograd, Alia J Codelia-Anjum, Kevin C Zorn, Dean Elterman, Naeem Bhojani, Seth K Bechis, Bilal Chughtai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vi NguyenDepartment of Urology, University of California, 9333 Genesee Avenue, Suite 320, La Jolla, CA, 92121, USA. Joie.de.vi15@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4363-5009
Joshua WinogradDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
Alia J Codelia-AnjumDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin C ZornDepartment of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Dean EltermanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Naeem BhojaniDepartment of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Seth K BechisDepartment of Urology, University of California, 9333 Genesee Avenue, Suite 320, La Jolla, CA, 92121, USA.
Bilal ChughtaiDepartment of Urology, New Hyde Park, Northwell Health, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate safety and feasibility of performing water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT; Rezum, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) without postoperative catheterization among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

methodsThis is a prospective, single arm, unblinded pilot study of 20 consecutive male patients ages 40-80 who underwent WVTT at a single academic institution. All patients underwent 1 injection per lobe at the point of maximal obstruction based on visualization. Primary outcome was evaluation of voiding parameters, symptom scores, and need for catheterization at 3 day, 1, 3, and 6 month follow up compared to baseline visit 30 days prior to surgery.

resultsMean age was 65 years (range 55-75). Mean prostate volume and PVR were 43 cc (range 30-68) and 89 cc, with 30% (n = 6) having median lobes. Patients received 2-3 treatments based on presence of bilobar versus trilobar hyperplasia. One patient (55 cc prostate, no median lobe) required catheterization for acute urinary retention on postoperative day 2. No patients required antibiotics for urinary tract infection or inpatient readmission within 30 days. Qmax significantly increased from 6 mL/s to 8, 13, 12, and 14 at 3 days, 1, 3, and 6 months (p < 0.05). IPSS decreased from 17 preoperatively to 10, 6, 7, and 8 (p < 0.05). No significant differences were noted in PVR, IIEF, MSHQ-EjD, or SF-12.

conclusionsIn well-selected men, catheter-free WVTT is feasible and improved voiding parameters and symptom scores. No changes in sexual function, infectious complications, or readmission were noted. Only 1 patient (5%) required postoperative catheterization within 30 days.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesProstatic HyperplasiaSteamAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansHyperthermia, InducedMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeSteamBenign prostatic hyperplasiaRezumWater vapor thermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID38904777
PMCPMC11192826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.