ArticleObesity surgery2024
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With or Without Jejunal Bypass.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Navigating uncharted territory in surgical innovation: systematic review of non-standard metabolic bariatric surgery procedures.The British journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Magnetic vs stapled technique in jejuno-ileal bipartition: one-year outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Sleeve Gastrectomy With Proximal Jejunal Bypass: Balancing Simplicity and Efficacy in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
- Case Report: Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plus jejunojejunal bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with obesity: a case series and review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated the weight loss effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and jejunal bypass (JJB) in treating obesity by analyzing and comparing the effects of LSG with or without JJB.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 150 patients with obesity who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery in Affiliated Xiaolan Hospital,Southern Medical University from October 2014 to April 2019. The patients were divided into two groups, LSG and LSG + JJB, according to the different surgical methods. The differences in the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (TWL) between the two groups were statistically analyzed.
resultsThe %EWL of the patients in the LSG group reached the maximum value at one year and six months post-surgery and steadily decreased after two years post-surgery. In contrast, the %EWL of the patients in the LSG + JJB group gradually increased after two years post-surgery; however, no significant difference between the two groups was observed. The TWL in the LSG + JJB group was significantly greater than that in the LSG group at each follow-up point.
conclusionPostoperative %EWL was similar in both groups. The TWL in the LSG + JJB group was greater than that in the LSG group, and the postoperative recurrent weight gain rate in the LSG + JJB group was lower than that in the LSG group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38904731What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.