ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Background factors determining the time to intraocular lens dislocation.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graft outcomes, reinterventions, and macular morbidity after DMEK in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Resuturing a Dislocated Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens in Brown-McLean Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Incidence and risk factors of late intraocular lens dislocation].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Surgically induced astigmatism and refractive outcomes after minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo clarify the characteristics of intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation requiring IOL suture or intraocular scleral fixation.
methodsThis retrospective consecutive case series included 21 eyes (21 patients) who required sutured or sutureless intrascleral IOL fixation following IOL extraction owing to IOL dislocation at the outpatient clinic in the Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Japan, between January and December 2019. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for background diseases, location of the dislocated IOL (intracapsular/extracapsular), insertion of a capsular tension ring (CTR), and the period from IOL insertion to dislocation.
resultsWe included 21 eyes of 21 patients who required IOL suture or intrascleral fixation for IOL dislocation at our clinic from January to December 2019 were included. The most common background disease was pseudoexfoliation syndrome (four cases), followed by atopic dermatitis, dysplasia/dehiscence of the zonule, post-retinal detachment surgery, high myopia, and uveitis (three cases each). At the time of dislocation, the IOLs were either intracapsular (16 cases, including 3 cases with CTR insertion) or extracapsular (5 cases). The time from IOL insertion to IOL dislocation was 13.7 ± 8.1 years (maximum: 31.3 years, minimum: 1.7 years).
conclusionsIn this study, all 21 cases represented late IOL dislocations occurring after 3 months postoperatively. Among these late IOL dislocation cases, IOL dislocation occurred in a short-medium period of time, especially in those with CTR insertion and weakness/dehiscence of the zonule, with an average of 3 to 5 years postoperatively. We propose referring to these cases as intermediate-term IOL dislocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38904711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.