Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904612›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Predicting Glaucoma Surgical Outcomes Using Neural Networks and Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records.

Samuel Barry, Sophia Y Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel BarryDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sophia Y WangByers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TIRIN MOORE · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Personalized Predictions for Glaucoma Progression Using Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Health RecordsK23EY032635 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SOPHIA YING · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY032635NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models to predict glaucoma surgical outcomes, including postoperative intraocular pressure, use of ocular antihypertensive medications, and need for repeat surgery. Methods: We identified glaucoma surgeries performed at Stanford from 2013-2024, with two or more postoperative visits with intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. Patient features were identified from the electronic health record (EHR), including demographics, prior diagnosis and procedure codes, medications and eye exam findings. Classical ML and DL models were developed to predict which glaucoma surgeries would result in surgical failure, defined as (1) IOP not reduced by more than 20% of preoperative baseline on two consecutive postoperative visits, (2) increased classes of glaucoma medications, and (3) need for additional glaucoma surgery or revision of original surgery. Results: A total of 2398 glaucoma surgeries of 1571 patients were included, of which 1677 surgeries met failure criteria. Random forest performed best for prediction of overall surgical failure, with accuracy of 75.5% and area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 76.7%, similar to the deep learning model (accuracy 75.5%, AUROC 76.6%). Across all models, prediction performance was better for IOP outcomes (AUROC 86%) than need for an additional surgery (AUROC 76%) or need for additional glaucoma medication (AUC 70%). Conclusions: ML and DL algorithms can predict glaucoma surgery outcomes using structured data inputs from EHRs. Translational Relevance: Models that predict outcomes of glaucoma surgery may one day provide the basis for clinical decision support tools supporting surgeons in personalizing glaucoma treatment plans.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGlaucomaIntraocular PressureMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAgedAntihypertensive AgentsDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID38904612
PMCPMC11193140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.