ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Predicting Glaucoma Surgical Outcomes Using Neural Networks and Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for surgical outcome prediction in glaucoma: a systematic review.Frontiers in big data · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Postoperative Outcomes in Anterior Segment and Ocular Adnexa Surgery: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology science · 2026Review
- Postoperative Risk and Climate Exposure: A Retrospective Study of Incisional Glaucoma Surgery Outcomes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Predicting Intraocular Pressure From Glaucoma Patients Receiving Medication Treatment Using Explainable Machine Learning.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma: Advances in Diagnosis, Progression Forecasting, and Surgical Outcome Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advances in Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment: Integrating Innovations for Enhanced Patient Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Lights and Shadows on Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma: Transforming Screening, Monitoring, and Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Multicenter evaluation of machine and deep learning methods to predict glaucoma surgical outcomes.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Technology in Glaucoma: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models to predict glaucoma surgical outcomes, including postoperative intraocular pressure, use of ocular antihypertensive medications, and need for repeat surgery. Methods: We identified glaucoma surgeries performed at Stanford from 2013-2024, with two or more postoperative visits with intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. Patient features were identified from the electronic health record (EHR), including demographics, prior diagnosis and procedure codes, medications and eye exam findings. Classical ML and DL models were developed to predict which glaucoma surgeries would result in surgical failure, defined as (1) IOP not reduced by more than 20% of preoperative baseline on two consecutive postoperative visits, (2) increased classes of glaucoma medications, and (3) need for additional glaucoma surgery or revision of original surgery. Results: A total of 2398 glaucoma surgeries of 1571 patients were included, of which 1677 surgeries met failure criteria. Random forest performed best for prediction of overall surgical failure, with accuracy of 75.5% and area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 76.7%, similar to the deep learning model (accuracy 75.5%, AUROC 76.6%). Across all models, prediction performance was better for IOP outcomes (AUROC 86%) than need for an additional surgery (AUROC 76%) or need for additional glaucoma medication (AUC 70%). Conclusions: ML and DL algorithms can predict glaucoma surgery outcomes using structured data inputs from EHRs. Translational Relevance: Models that predict outcomes of glaucoma surgery may one day provide the basis for clinical decision support tools supporting surgeons in personalizing glaucoma treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.