Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904416›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

LEAP: LLM instruction-example adaptive prompting framework for biomedical relation extraction.

Huixue Zhou, Mingchen Li, Yongkang Xiao, Han Yang, Rui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Large language models in biomedicine and health: current research landscape and future directions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huixue ZhouInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-5506
Mingchen LiDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Yongkang XiaoInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-8371
Han YangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-4322-6753
Rui ZhangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-3585

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NCI NIH HHS R01CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154NIA NIH HHS R01AG078154NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the demonstration in large language models (LLMs) for biomedical relation extraction. This study introduces a framework comprising three types of adaptive tuning methods to assess their impacts and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND

methodsOur study was conducted in two phases. Initially, we analyzed a range of demonstration components vital for LLMs' biomedical data capabilities, including task descriptions and examples, experimenting with various combinations. Subsequently, we introduced the LLM instruction-example adaptive prompting (LEAP) framework, including instruction adaptive tuning, example adaptive tuning, and instruction-example adaptive tuning methods. This framework aims to systematically investigate both adaptive task descriptions and adaptive examples within the demonstration. We assessed the performance of the LEAP framework on the DDI, ChemProt, and BioRED datasets, employing LLMs such as Llama2-7b, Llama2-13b, and MedLLaMA_13B.

resultsOur findings indicated that Instruction + Options + Example and its expanded form substantially improved F1 scores over the standard Instruction + Options mode for zero-shot LLMs. The LEAP framework, particularly through its example adaptive prompting, demonstrated superior performance over conventional instruction tuning across all models. Notably, the MedLLAMA_13B model achieved an exceptional F1 score of 95.13 on the ChemProt dataset using this method. Significant improvements were also observed in the DDI 2013 and BioRED datasets, confirming the method's robustness in sophisticated data extraction scenarios.

conclusionThe LEAP framework offers a compelling strategy for enhancing LLM training strategies, steering away from extensive fine-tuning towards more dynamic and contextually enriched prompting methodologies, showcasing in biomedical relation extraction.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingData MiningDatasets as Topicbiomedical relation extractioninstruction-example adaptive promptinginstruction tuninglarge language modelnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38904416
PMCPMC11339510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.