ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
LEAP: LLM instruction-example adaptive prompting framework for biomedical relation extraction.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Rise of Small Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey.Computer science review · 2026Article
- A pretrained biomedical large language model for Persian biomedical text mining.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large Language Model Synergy for Ensemble Learning in Medical Question Answering: Design and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- RAMIE: retrieval-augmented multi-task information extraction with large language models on dietary supplements.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Automatic extraction of SmPC document for IDMP data model construction using foundation LLM and RAG: a preliminary experiment for pharmaceutical regulatory affairs.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-modality risk prediction of cardiovascular diseases for breast cancer cohort in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Enhancing the interoperability and transparency of real-world data extraction in clinical research: evaluating the feasibility and impact of a ChatGLM implementation in Chinese hospital settings.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Large language models in biomedicine and health: current research landscape and future directions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the demonstration in large language models (LLMs) for biomedical relation extraction. This study introduces a framework comprising three types of adaptive tuning methods to assess their impacts and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur study was conducted in two phases. Initially, we analyzed a range of demonstration components vital for LLMs' biomedical data capabilities, including task descriptions and examples, experimenting with various combinations. Subsequently, we introduced the LLM instruction-example adaptive prompting (LEAP) framework, including instruction adaptive tuning, example adaptive tuning, and instruction-example adaptive tuning methods. This framework aims to systematically investigate both adaptive task descriptions and adaptive examples within the demonstration. We assessed the performance of the LEAP framework on the DDI, ChemProt, and BioRED datasets, employing LLMs such as Llama2-7b, Llama2-13b, and MedLLaMA_13B.
resultsOur findings indicated that Instruction + Options + Example and its expanded form substantially improved F1 scores over the standard Instruction + Options mode for zero-shot LLMs. The LEAP framework, particularly through its example adaptive prompting, demonstrated superior performance over conventional instruction tuning across all models. Notably, the MedLLAMA_13B model achieved an exceptional F1 score of 95.13 on the ChemProt dataset using this method. Significant improvements were also observed in the DDI 2013 and BioRED datasets, confirming the method's robustness in sophisticated data extraction scenarios.
conclusionThe LEAP framework offers a compelling strategy for enhancing LLM training strategies, steering away from extensive fine-tuning towards more dynamic and contextually enriched prompting methodologies, showcasing in biomedical relation extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.