Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904411›Full record

ArticlemBio2024

Community interactions among microbes give rise to host-microbiome mutualisms in an aquatic plant.

Jason R Laurich, Emma Lash, Anna M O'Brien, Oxana Pogoutse, Megan E Frederickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early seed priming with closely relatedHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecotoxicology ofToxins · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Role of the Foliar EndophyteMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason R LaurichDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-5881
Emma LashDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna M O'BrienDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-8620
Oxana PogoutseDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-1656-7545
Megan E FredericksonDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9058-7137

Funding

Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) RGPIN-2021-03711, RGPAS-2021-00014Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) GBMF9356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes often benefit plants, conferring resistance to pathogens, improving stress tolerance, or promoting plant growth. As potential plant mutualists, however, microbiomes are not a single organism but a community of species with complex interactions among microbial taxa and between microbes and their shared host. The nature of ecological interactions among microbes in the microbiome can have important consequences for the net effects of microbiomes on hosts. Here, we compared the effects of individual microbial strains and 10-strain synthetic communities on microbial productivity and host growth using the common duckweed IMPORTANCE: There is currently substantial interest in engineering synthetic microbiomes for health or agricultural applications. One key question is how multi-strain microbial communities differ from single microbial strains in their productivity and effects on hosts. We tested 20 single bacterial strains and 2 distinct 10-strain synthetic communities on plant hosts and found that 10-strain communities led to faster host growth and greater microbial productivity than the average, but not the best, single strain. Furthermore, the microbial strains or communities that achieved the greatest cell densities were also the most beneficial to their hosts, showing that both specific single strains and multi-strain synthetic communities can engage in high-quality mutualisms with their hosts. Our results suggest that ~5% of single strains, as well as multi-strain synthetic communities comprised largely of commensal microbes, can benefit hosts and result in effective host-microbe mutualisms.

Indexed as

AraceaeMicrobiotaSymbiosisHost Microbial InteractionsMicrobial InteractionsPseudomonascompetitionLemna minormicrobiomemutualismplant-microbe interactions

Identifiers

PMID38904411
PMCPMC11324027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.