ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024
Improved Blue Carba test and Carba NP test for detection and classification of major Class A and B carbapenemases, including dual producers, among Gram-negative bacilli.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline for antimicrobial treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: practice recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesGuideline
- Ceftazidime-Avibactam With or Without Aztreonam Versus Other Active Antimicrobials in the Treatment of Bloodstream Infections by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Impact of third-generation cephalosporin and carbapenem resistance profiles on the mortality of patients withJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Novel Insights into Carbapenem Resistance: Mechanisms, Diagnostics, and Future Directions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rapid and high-sensitivity quantitative fluorescent immunoassay for detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bimetallic nanotubes enhanced MALDI-TOF MS for rapid detection of carbapenemase activity in Klebsiella pneumoniae.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in the Aconcagua River, Chile: Prevalence and Characterization of Resistant Bacteria in a Watershed Under High Anthropogenic Contamination Pressure.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Revisiting the Metallo-International journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of infection control measures informed by a modified Blue-Carba test in reducing rectal carriage of carbapenemase-producing bacteria in general wards: a prospective interrupted time series study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prompt and precise identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is crucial for guiding clinical antibiotic treatments and limiting transmission. Here, we propose modifying the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNPd) to identify molecular carbapenemase classes, including dual carbapenemase strains, by adding specific Class A and Class B inhibitors. We tested 171 carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli strains-21 in Class A (KPC, NMC, SME), 58 in Class B (IMP, VIM, NDM, SPM), and 92 with dual carbapenemase production (KPC+NDM, KPC+IMP, KPC+VIM), all previously positive with BCT or CNPd. We also included 13 carbapenemase non-producers. β-lactamases were previously characterized by PCR. The improved BCT/CNPd methods detect imipenem hydrolysis from an imipenem-cilastatin solution, using pH indicators and Class A (avibactam) and/or Class B (EDTA) inhibitors. Results were interpreted visually based on color changes. CNPd achieved 99.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity in categorizing carbapenemases, while BCT had 91.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Performance varied by carbapenemase classes: both tests classified all Class A-producing strains. For Class B, the CNP test identified 57/58 strains (98.3%), whereas the BCT test, 45/58 strains (77.6%), with non-fermenters posing the greatest detection challenge. For Classes A plus B dual producers, both tests performed exceptionally well, with only one indeterminate strain for the BCT. The statistical comparison showed both methods had similar times to a positive result, with differences based on the carbapenemase class or bacterial group involved. This improved assay rapidly distinguishes major Class A or Class B carbapenemase producers among Gram-negative bacilli, including dual-class combinations, in less than 2 hours. IMPORTANCE: Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is of vital importance in guiding appropriate clinical antibiotic treatments and curbing their transmission. The emergence of negative bacilli carrying multiple carbapenemase combinations during and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has posed a challenge to the conventional biochemical tests typically used to determine the specific carbapenemase type in the isolated strains. Several initiatives have aimed to enhance colorimetric methods, enabling them to independently identify the presence of Class A or Class B carbapenemases. Notably, no previous efforts have been made to distinguish both classes simultaneously. Additionally, these modifications have struggled to differentiate between carriers of multiple carbapenemases, a common occurrence in many Latin American countries. In this study, we introduced specific Class A and Class B carbapenemase inhibitors into the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNP) colorimetric assays to identify the type of carbapenemase, even in cases of multiple carbapenemase producers within these classes. These updated assays demonstrated exceptional sensitivity and specificity (≥ 90%) all within a rapid turnaround time of under 2 hours, typically completed in just 45 minutes. These in-house enhancements to the BCT and CNP assays present a rapid, straightforward, and cost-effective approach to determining the primary carbapenemase classes. They could serve as a viable alternative to molecular biology or immuno-chromatography techniques, acting as an initial diagnostic step in the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.