ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2024
Algorithms to identify radiotherapy intent in unresected non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: an I-O Optimise analysis.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing real-world research in thoracic malignancies: learnings from the international I-O Optimise initiative.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate the performance of algorithms for identifying radiotherapy (RT) treatment intent in real-world data from patients with non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using data from IPO-Porto hospital (Portugal) and the REAL-Oncology database (England), three algorithms were developed based on available RT information (#1: RT duration, #2: RT duration and type, #3: RT dose) and tested versus reference datasets. Study results showed that all three algorithms had good overall accuracy (91-100%) for patients receiving RT plus systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) and algorithms #2 and #3 also had good accuracy (>99%) for patients receiving RT alone. These algorithms could help classify treatment intent in patients with NSCLC receiving RT with or without SACT in real-world settings where intent information is missing/incomplete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.