Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38904067›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Characterizing the metabolome and microbiome at giant panda scent marking sites during the mating season.

Jin Hou, Vanessa Hull, Masanori Fujimoto, Zejun Zhang, Xiaoyuan Chen, Shiyu Chen, Rui Chen, Thomas Connor, Dunwu Qi, Jindong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jin HouKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637002, China.
Vanessa HullDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Masanori FujimotoSoil and Water Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Zejun ZhangKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637002, China.
Xiaoyuan ChenKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637002, China.
Shiyu ChenKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637002, China.
Rui ChenKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637002, China.
Thomas ConnorDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Dunwu QiChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610081, China.
Jindong ZhangKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637002, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scent marking sites served as a primary means of chemical communication for giant pandas, enabling intraspecific communication. We integrated metabolomics and high-throughput sequencing techniques to examine the non-targeted metabolome and microbial community structure of scent marking sites and feces in the field. Integrative analysis revealed a more comprehensive array of chemical compounds compared to previous investigations, including ketones, acids, heterocycles, alcohols, and aldehydes. Notably, specific compounds such as 2-decenal, (E)-, octanal, decanal, L-α-terpineol, vanillin, and nonanal emerged as potential key players in scent signaling. Intriguingly, our study of the microbial domain identified dominant bacterial species from the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria phyla, likely orchestrating metabolic processes at scent marking sites. Comparative analyses showed, for the first time, that feces do not share the same functions as scent markers, indicating distinct functional roles. This research deepens scientific understanding of chemical communication in wild pandas.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsMicrobiomeZoology

Identifiers

PMID38904067
PMCPMC11186968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.