Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38903953›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2024

Using artificial intelligence to predict mortality in AKI patients: a systematic review/meta-analysis.

Rupesh Raina, Raghav Shah, Paul Nemer, Jared Fehlmen, Lena Nemer, Ali Murra, Abhishek Tibrewal, Sidharth Kumar Sethi, Javier A Neyra, Jay Koyner

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rupesh RainaAkron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
Raghav ShahAkron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
Paul NemerBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jared FehlmenNortheast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Lena NemerUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Ali MurraNortheast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Abhishek TibrewalAkron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
Sidharth Kumar SethiPediatric Nephrology, Medanta, The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-3393
Javier A NeyraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jay KoynerSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Using Machine Learning for Early Recognition and Personalized Treatment of Acute Kidney InjuryR01DK126933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHURPEK, MATTHEW MICHAEL, KOYNER, JAY L · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK126933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased morbidity/mortality. With artificial intelligence (AI), more dynamic models for mortality prediction in AKI patients have been developed using machine learning (ML) algorithms. The performance of various ML models was reviewed in terms of their ability to predict in-hospital mortality for AKI patients. Methods: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. Included studies contained variables regarding the efficacy of the AI model [the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value]. Only original studies that consisted of cross-sectional studies, prospective and retrospective studies were included, while reviews and self-reported outcomes were excluded. There was no restriction on time and geographic location. Results: Eight studies with 37 032 AKI patients were included, with a mean age of 65.3 years. The in-hospital mortality was 18.0% in the derivation and 15.8% in the validation cohorts. The pooled [95% confidence interval (CI)] AUC was observed to be highest for the broad learning system (BLS) model [0.852 (0.820-0.883)] and elastic net final (ENF) model [0.852 (0.813-0.891)], and lowest for proposed clinical model (PCM) [0.765 (0.716-0.814)]. The pooled (95% CI) AUC of BLS and ENF did not differ significantly from other models except PCM [Delong's test Conclusion: Our results show that BLS and ENF models are equally effective as other ML models in predicting in-hospital mortality, with variability across all models. Additional studies are needed.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryartificial intelligencemachine learningmortalityprediction

Identifiers

PMID38903953
PMCPMC11187489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.