Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38903933›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Quantification of neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein in finger-prick blood.

Magdalena A Kolanko, Hanna Huber, Michael C B David, Laia Montoliu-Gaya, Joel Simrén, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Ramin Nilforooshan, Paresh Malhotra, David J Sharp and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Magdalena A KolankoUK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Imperial College London, 9SMUB, White City Campus, W12 0BZ London, UK.
Hanna HuberDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 43141 Mölndal, Sweden.
Michael C B DavidUK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Imperial College London, 9SMUB, White City Campus, W12 0BZ London, UK.
Laia Montoliu-GayaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 43141 Mölndal, Sweden.
Joel SimrénDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 43141 Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-6604
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 43141 Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 43141 Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-4354
Ramin NilforooshanUK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Imperial College London, 9SMUB, White City Campus, W12 0BZ London, UK.
Paresh MalhotraUK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Imperial College London, 9SMUB, White City Campus, W12 0BZ London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-0780
David J SharpUK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Imperial College London, 9SMUB, White City Campus, W12 0BZ London, UK.
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 43141 Mölndal, Sweden.
Neil S N GrahamUK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Imperial College London, 9SMUB, White City Campus, W12 0BZ London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-3368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease and traumatic brain injury is important for prognostication and treatment. Neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are leading biomarkers for neurodegeneration and glial activation that are detectable in blood. Yet, current recommendations require rapid centrifugation and ultra-low temperature storage post-venepuncture. Here, we investigated if these markers can be accurately measured in finger-prick blood using dried plasma spot cards. Fifty patients (46 with dementia; 4 with traumatic brain injury) and 19 healthy volunteers underwent finger-prick and venous sampling using dried plasma spot cards and aligned plasma sampling. Neurofilament light and GFAP were quantified using a Single molecule array assay and correlations between plasma and dried plasma spot cards assessed. Biomarker concentrations in plasma and finger-prick dried plasma spot samples were significantly positively correlated (neurofilament light

Indexed as

biomarkersdementiadiagnosishead injurytesting

Identifiers

PMID38903933
PMCPMC11189302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.