Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38903883›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

A comparison of the performance of bacterial biofilters and fungal-bacterial coupled biofilters in BTE

Hai Wang, Xiaojuan Xue, Xujun Nan, Jian Zhai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hai WangSchool of Environmental Engineering, Gansu Forestry Polytechnic, Tianshui, China.
Xiaojuan XueSchool of Environmental Engineering, Gansu Forestry Polytechnic, Tianshui, China.
Xujun NanSchool of Environmental Engineering, Gansu Forestry Polytechnic, Tianshui, China.
Jian ZhaiSchool of Environmental Engineering, Gansu Forestry Polytechnic, Tianshui, China.

Funding

Initial Scientific Research Fund of High-level Talents in Shanghai Publishing and Printing College, ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Gansu Province of China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conventional biofilters, which rely on bacterial activity, face challenges in eliminating hydrophobic compounds, such as aromatic compounds. This is due to the low solubility of these compounds in water, which makes them difficult to absorb by bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, biofilter operational stability is often hampered by acidification and drying out of the filter bed. Methods: Two bioreactors, a bacterial biofilter (B-BF) and a fungal-bacterial coupled biofilter (F&B-BF) were inoculated with activated sludge from the secondary sedimentation tank of the Sinopec Yangzi Petrochemical Company wastewater treatment plant located in Nanjing, China. For approximately 6 months of operation, a F&B-BF was more effective than a B-BF in eliminating a gas-phase mixture containing benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and Results: After operating for four months, the F&B-BF showed higher removal efficiencies for toluene (T), ethylbenzene (E), benzene (B), and Conclusions: It was found that a starvation protocol was beneficial for the stable operation of both the B-BF and F&B-BF. Community structure analysis showed that the bacterial genus

Indexed as

BacteriaBenzene DerivativesBioreactorsFiltrationFungiXylenesBenzeneBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiofilmsChinaToluene4-xyleneBenzeneBenzene DerivativesethylbenzeneTolueneXylenesBacterial biofilterBTEp-XFungal-bacterial coupled biofilterMicrobial community structureRemoval performance

Identifiers

PMID38903883
PMCPMC11188933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.