Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38903806›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Comparing quantitative image parameters between animal and clinical CT-scanners: a translational phantom study analysis.

Abhinay Vellala, Carolin Mogler, Florian Haag, Fabian Tollens, Henning Rudolf, Friedrich Pietsch, Carmen Wängler, Björn Wängler, Stefan O Schoenberg, Matthias F Froelich and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abhinay VellalaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Carolin MoglerDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian HaagDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Fabian TollensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Henning RudolfDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Friedrich PietschDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Carmen WänglerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Björn WänglerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan O SchoenbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Matthias F FroelichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Alexander HertelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares phantom-based variability of extracted radiomics features from scans on a photon counting CT (PCCT) and an experimental animal PET/CT-scanner (Albira II) to investigate the potential of radiomics for translation from animal models to human scans. While oncological basic research in animal PET/CT has allowed an intrinsic comparison between PET and CT, but no 1:1 translation to a human CT scanner due to resolution and noise limitations, Radiomics as a statistical and thus scale-independent method can potentially close the critical gap. Methods: Two phantoms were scanned on a PCCT and animal PET/CT-scanner with different scan parameters and then the radiomics parameters were extracted. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted. To overcome the limitation of a small dataset, a data augmentation technique was applied. A Ridge Classifier was trained and a Feature Importance- and Cluster analysis was performed. Results: PCA and Cluster Analysis shows a clear differentiation between phantom types while emphasizing the comparability of both scanners. The Ridge Classifier exhibited a strong training performance with 93% accuracy, but faced challenges in generalization with a test accuracy of 62%. Conclusion: These results show that radiomics has great potential as a translational tool between animal models and human routine diagnostics, especially using the novel photon counting technique. This is another crucial step towards integration of radiomics analysis into clinical practice.

Indexed as

animal modelsdiagnostic integrationphoton counting CTradiomicstranslation

Identifiers

PMID38903806
PMCPMC11188677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.