ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Epitope screening and self-assembled nanovaccine molecule design of PDCoV-S protein based on immunoinformatics.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering a dimeric porcine deltacoronavirus S-RBD subunit vaccine for enhanced immunogenicity and neutralizing antibody responses.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics-driven multi-epitope vaccine design as a promising strategy against multidrug-resistant pathogens: a comprehensive review.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Biomimetic nanovaccines in cancer therapy: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- A multi-epitope vaccine incorporating adhesin-derived antigens protects againstFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- In-silico core proteome analysis for chimeric vaccine development against tick-borne tularemia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Self-Assembled Ferritin Nanoparticles for Delivery of Antigens and Development of Vaccines: From Structure and Property to Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the whole virus or spike protein of pigs, δ coronavirus (PDCoV) as an immunogen may have unrelated antigenic epitope interference. Therefore, it is essential for screening and identifying advantageous protective antigen epitopes. In addition, immunoinformatic tools are described as an important aid in determining protective antigenic epitopes. In this study, the primary, secondary, and tertiary structures of vaccines were measured using ExPASy, PSIPRED 4.0, and trRosetta servers. Meanwhile, the molecular docking analysis and vector of the candidate nanovaccine were constructed. The immune response of the candidate vaccine was simulated and predicted using the C-ImmSim server. This experiment screened B cell epitopes with strong immunogenicity and high conservation, CTL epitopes, and Th epitopes with IFN-γ and IL-4 positive spike proteins. Ferritin is used as a self-assembled nanoparticle element for designing candidate nanovaccine. After analysis, it has been found to be soluble, stable, non-allergenic, and has a high affinity for its target receptor, TLR-3. The preliminary simulation analysis results show that the candidate nanovaccine has the ability to induce a humoral and cellular immune response. Therefore, it may provide a new theoretical basis for research on coronavirus self-assembled nanovaccines. It may be an effective candidate vaccine for controlling and preventing PDCoV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.