ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Red foxes (
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Occurrence, Co-infections and Genetic Characterization of Sarcocystis miescheriana, Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) from Türkiye.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- High Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Molecular and Microscopic Identification ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization of Sarcocystis spp. in intestines of coyotes and foxes from Pennsylvania, USA.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Microscopic and Molecular Identification ofBiology · 2026Article
- Molecular Evidence of the Role of the Red Fox (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Microscopic and Molecular Identification ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- High richness of ungulate Sarcocystis species in intestines of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) from Lithuania.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- European Pine Marten (Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular Evidence of Raccoon DogPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and molecular analysis ofVeterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Molecular Confirmation of Raptors from Spain as Definitive Hosts of NumerousAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Prevalence and assemblage distribution ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- The Genetic Identification of Numerous ApicomplexanAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Approximately 5 g of the contents of large intestine from 200 animals (197 red foxes and three raccoon dogs) were examined by flotation centrifugation coprological method. Only samples of 50 red foxes and one raccoon dog positive to Results: In total, 38.1% of the red foxes and 66.7% of the raccoon dogs were positive to Conclusion: This is the first study where the potential role of the red fox and raccoon dogs as spreaders of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.