Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38903425›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Estimation of soybean yield based on high-throughput phenotyping and machine learning.

Xiuni Li, Menggen Chen, Shuyuan He, Xiangyao Xu, Lingxiao He, Li Wang, Yang Gao, Fenda Tang, Tao Gong, Wenyan Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xiuni LiCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Menggen ChenCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Shuyuan HeCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiangyao XuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Lingxiao HeCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Li WangCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yang GaoCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Fenda TangCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Tao GongCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Wenyan WangCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Mei XuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Chunyan LiuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Liang YuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Weiguo LiuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Wenyu YangCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Soybeans are an important crop used for food, oil, and feed. However, China's soybean self-sufficiency is highly inadequate, with an annual import volume exceeding 80%. RGB cameras serve as powerful tools for estimating crop yield, and machine learning is a practical method based on various features, providing improved yield predictions. However, selecting different input parameters and models, specifically optimal features and model effects, significantly influences soybean yield prediction. Methods: This study used an RGB camera to capture soybean canopy images from both the side and top perspectives during the R6 stage (pod filling stage) for 240 soybean varieties (a natural population formed by four provinces in China: Sichuan, Yunnan, Chongqing, and Guizhou). From these images, the morphological, color, and textural features of the soybeans were extracted. Subsequently, feature selection was performed on the image parameters using a Pearson correlation coefficient threshold ≥0.5. Five machine learning methods, namely, CatBoost, LightGBM, RF, GBDT, and MLP, were employed to establish soybean yield estimation models based on the individual and combined image parameters from the two perspectives extracted from RGB images. Results: (1) GBDT is the optimal model for predicting soybean yield, with a test set R2 value of 0.82, an RMSE of 1.99 g/plant, and an MAE of 3.12%. (2) The fusion of multiangle and multitype indicators is conducive to improving soybean yield prediction accuracy. Conclusion: Therefore, this combination of parameters extracted from RGB images via machine learning has great potential for estimating soybean yield, providing a theoretical basis and technical support for accelerating the soybean breeding process.

Indexed as

estimationmachine learningRGBsoybeanyield

Identifiers

PMID38903425
PMCPMC11187272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.