ArticleCureus2024
Endocrown: A Conservative Approach in the Management of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Periodontal health of endodontically treated molars restored with composite CAD/CAM endocrowns versus stainless steel crowns in Egyptian children: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Evaluating the Influence of Ferrule Preparation on Zirconia Endocrown Efficacy in Primary Molars: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- In-vitro comparison of fracture resistance and failure patterns of endocrowns versus post-and-core restorations in maxillary central incisors with and without ferrule.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Endocrown-retained fixed partial dentures: Revolutionizing tooth restoration or risky business? A finite element study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Article
- Direct Versus Indirect Treatment Options of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outcome of an endodontic procedure determines the clinical success of the treated tooth. A post-endodontic restoration will restore the tooth's form, function, and aesthetics while preserving and safeguarding its existing tooth structure. To restore endodontically treated teeth with the best possible tissue preservation, the least invasive preparation is the aim. Full-coverage crowns are still more popular than partial-coverage crowns. Conservative dental procedures such as inlays, overlays, and endocrowns maximize the amount of tooth structure that is intact while minimizing the amount of tooth structure that is removed. Compared to posts, cores, and crowns, endocrowns offer several advantages in terms of ease of preparation, application, and reduced clinical visits and time. Endocrown is a simple, minimally invasive preparation usually given when margins are supragingival, which makes it self-cleansable and maintains natural tooth contact, preventing interference with periodontal tissue. This case report focuses on managing endodontically treated teeth with the fabrication of endocrown using computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.