ArticleCureus2024
Neurosensory Evaluation Following Genioplasty: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genioplasty is a common procedure in plastic surgery, with various alloplastic biomaterials utilized for chin augmentation. Despite their advantages, complications such as neuropraxia of the mental nerve can occur, leading to temporary or persistent sensory disturbances. This case report describes a 35-year-old female who sought correction of a small chin. Preoperative evaluation revealed a retrognathic profile, and the patient underwent genioplasty with high-density porous polyethylene implantation. Postoperatively, she experienced mild paresthesia, which improved over time. Neurosensory assessments, including mechanical and light touch tests, showed no abnormalities in A-beta and C fibers but decreased sensitivity in A-delta fibers. This case report emphasizes the importance of evaluating larger nerve fibers during postoperative assessments and the need for standardized testing methodologies to comprehensively assess nerve damage after genioplasty. Further research should explore strategies to standardize neurosensory assessment and optimize therapeutic interventions for nerve damage after genioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.