ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Carbon Fiber Posts and Glass Fiber Posts in Permanent Anterior Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using 3 Different Posts: Protocol for a Comparative Evaluation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth restored with custom-milled zirconia versus prefabricated fiber posts: AnBioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Dental caries and traumatic injuries often lead to tooth loss in adolescents and adults, necessitating endodontic treatment and subsequent restoration. Restoring such teeth presents a challenge due to varying degrees of substance loss. After endodontic treatment, the choice of an appropriate post is crucial for long-term stability. While metal posts are sturdy, they lack aesthetics and may cause root fractures. Fiber posts, such as carbon and glass fiber, offer improved aesthetics and mechanical properties, but their comparative performance warrants investigation. Materials and methods A total of 30 extracted anterior single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups to receive either carbon fiber or glass fiber posts. After endodontic treatment and post-space preparation, the posts were cemented using a dual polymerizing adhesive resin composite. Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. Results The mean fracture resistance of the carbon fiber post group was recorded at 271.2 N, whereas the glass fiber post group exhibited a significantly higher mean fracture resistance of 416.133 N. This difference in fracture resistance between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion Glass fiber post systems demonstrated superior fracture resistance compared to carbon fiber post systems in anterior single-rooted teeth. These findings support the clinical preference for glass fiber posts in restoring endodontically treated anterior teeth, offering both mechanical reliability and aesthetic advantages. However, further research, including long-term clinical trials, is warranted to validate these findings and assess the overall clinical performance and longevity of fiber post systems in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.