Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902885›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Testing and characterization of herding dogs' behaviors.

Boris Lasserre, Barbara Ducreux, Marjorie Chassier, Louise Joly, Pascal Cacheux, Thierry Le Morzadec, Stéphanie Dayde-Fonda, Caroline Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Boris LasserreDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Barbara DucreuxDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Marjorie ChassierDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Louise JolyDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Pascal CacheuxDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Thierry Le MorzadecDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Stéphanie Dayde-FondaDepartment of Genetics, Institut de l'Elevage, Lyon 69007, France.
Caroline GilbertEcole Nationale Vétérinaire, Maisons-Alfort 94704, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding for phenotype in herding dogs (HDs) mainly relies on their performance in national field trial competitions, which has been shown to be inadequate for identifying HDs suited for real livestock farming conditions. In this study, a different field trial with a new scoring system consisting of 28 items to consider was designed to assess young HDs, the results of which culminated in a statement of adequate phenotype (AP) or non-adequate phenotype (NAP). An AP HD was defined as being able: to control the direction of a flock, to keep it grouped close to a handler when needed, to confront animals it is dealing with in a respectful manner, and able to create movement of the flock without excessive disturbance, threatening or attacking it through chasing, or uncontrolled biting. This innovative trial is composed of a pre-test (PT) and a test (T) phase. To evaluate its efficiency in detecting AP/NAP, 460 French Border Collies aged between 8 and 24 mo, underwent the trial. Its average duration (PT + T) was 3 min and 16 s (SD = 26 s). According to experts' assessments (Gold Standard), 16.5% of tested HD reached an AP score, and the Idele scoring system correctly identified 93.3% of them (sensitivity). Specificity and accuracy values were of 96.1% and 95.7%, respectively (P value < 0.0004). Recursive feature elimination identified 25 of the 118 features (categories of items) from the scoring system as significant predictors of AP/NAP. An AP HD was statistically defined as a dog who completed the PT and T phases, showed keenness, correct position in relation to the handler, and absence of prey drive. Four environmental effects significantly influenced AP/NAP: the field trial session, the owner's experience with HDs, the conditions of the HD's first contact with livestock, and the type of livestock with which the HD is accustomed to working (P-values <0.0005, <0.05, <0.05, and <0.007, respectively). Inter-evaluator agreement was substantial (0.70). The field trial proved to be a short, easily implemented, standardized, reproducible method for detecting AP/NAP. Hence, the field trial and its scoring system could provide a basis for a breeding program based on phenotype pending additional testing of HDs and genetic analyses.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBreedingDogsFemaleMalePhenotypeadequate phenotypebreeding selectionfield trialherding dogherding traitsscoring system

Identifiers

PMID38902885
PMCPMC11222981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.